Literature DB >> 12209302

Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data [corrected].

A M Grant1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration was established to provide reliable evaluation of newer methods of groin hernia repair. It involved 70 investigators in 20 countries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty eligible trials (5016 participants) of open mesh vs. non-mesh groin hernia repair were identified. Meta-analysis was performed using raw individual patient data where possible.
RESULTS: Fewer hernia recurrences were reported after mesh repair. There were no clear differences between mesh and non-mesh groups in complications. Overall, those in the mesh groups had a shorter hospital stay, quicker return to usual activities and less frequent persisting pain, but individual trial results varied.
CONCLUSIONS: The review provides strong evidence that open mesh repair is associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrence of between 50% and 75%. There is also some evidence of quicker recovery and of lower rates of persisting pain following open mesh repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12209302     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-002-0073-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  46 in total

Review 1.  Causes of recurrences after open inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  D Ashrafi; M Siddaiah-Subramanya; B Memon; M A Memon
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Long-term follow-up after Lichtenstein hernioplasty in a general surgical unit.

Authors:  L Verstraete; H Swannet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  The time profile of groin hernia recurrences.

Authors:  N Magnusson; P Nordin; M Hedberg; U Gunnarsson; G Sandblom
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  K McCormack; B L Wake; C Fraser; L Vale; J Perez; A Grant
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Comparative investigation of alloplastic materials for hernia repair with improved methodology.

Authors:  M Kapischke; K Prinz; J Tepel; J Tensfeldt; T Schulz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Kirsten Meurer; Karl-Heinz Bauer; Georgios Papapostolou; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Hernia surgery changes in the Amsterdam region 1994-2001: decrease in operations for recurrent hernia.

Authors:  T J Aufenacker; D H de Lange; M D Burg; B W Kuiken; E F Hensen; I G Schoots; D J Gouma; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Transinguinal preperitoneal repair with the Polysoft patch: prospective evaluation of recurrence and chronic pain.

Authors:  E P Pélissier; D Blum; Ph Ngo; O Monek
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia.

Authors:  S K Richards; M N Vipond; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Is there a need for a mesh plug in inguinal hernia repair? Randomized, prospective study of the use of Hertra 1 mesh compared to PerFix Plug.

Authors:  W Adamonis; P Witkowski; M Smietański; J Bigda; Z Sledziński
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.