Literature DB >> 15821485

Treatment of patients with high risk localized prostate cancer: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (CaPSURE).

Maxwell V Meng1, Eric P Elkin, David M Latini, Janeen Duchane, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pretreatment risk assessment models facilitate more appropriate selection of treatment for prostate cancer. However, men with high risk disease remain a challenge with significant potential for primary treatment failure. We characterize patterns of treatment for high risk prostate cancer in a community based cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) database, a longitudinal disease registry of men with prostate cancer, we identified those with nonmetastatic, high risk disease based on T stage, tumor grade and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). Differences in primary treatment, and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in patients at low, intermediate and high risk were assessed. In the high risk cohort predictors of the type of primary treatment, and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen therapy were identified.
RESULTS: Of the cancers 34%, 40% and 26% were low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. Differences in primary treatment type among the 3 risk groups were statistically significant (p <0.0001) with increasing external beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation, and decreased surgery, brachytherapy and surveillance in men with high risk cancers. In this group older age, higher PSA and nonprivate insurance were associated with decreased use of radical prostatectomy. More than half of the men at high risk receiving radiation therapy also received androgen deprivation, which was significantly higher than in the low and intermediate risk groups (p <0.0001). Factors associated with androgen deprivation in high risk disease were primary therapy, PSA, Gleason sum, T stage, body mass index, insurance status and ethnicity. PSA and Gleason sum were the primary determinants of adjuvant radiation after prostatectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Men with high risk but nonmetastatic prostate cancer are more likely to receive radiation therapy as well as androgen deprivation with the latter as primary therapy or in conjunction with local treatment. These data stress the importance of pretreatment risk stratification, education regarding appropriate combinations of local and systemic therapies, and the consideration of novel clinical trials in patients at higher risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821485     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154610.81916.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  41 in total

Review 1.  Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexandre Ingels; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Pathological findings and oncological control afforded by radical prostatectomy in men with high-risk prostate cancer: a single-centre study.

Authors:  Alexandra Masson-Lecomte; Vincent Hupertan; Eva Comperat; Christophe Vaessen; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Olivier Cussenot; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Oncologic Outcome of Radical Prostatectomy as Monotherapy for Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Junya Furukawa; Hideaki Miyake; Taka-Aki Inoue; Takayoshi Ogawa; Hirokazu Tanaka; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-05-20

4.  Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.

Authors:  Pooya Banapour; Andrew Schumacher; Jane C Lin; David S Finley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

5.  Evolution of the clinical presentation of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Neoadjuvant luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate improves prostate-specific antigen-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Koji Mitsuzuka; Takahiro Yoneyama; Shintaro Narita; Sadafumi Kawamura; Yasuhiro Kaiho; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Tatsuo Tochigi; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama; Tohru Yoneyama; Yuki Tobisawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Bach; Sailaja Pisipati; Datesh Daneshwar; Mark Wright; Edward Rowe; David Gillatt; Raj Persad; Anthony Koupparis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Scott E Eggener; Angel M Serio; Brett S Carver; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Role of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-09-16

10.  What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Edward M Schaeffer; Bruce J Trock; Jonathan I Epstein; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.