Literature DB >> 25681879

Neoadjuvant luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate improves prostate-specific antigen-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Takuya Koie1, Koji Mitsuzuka2, Takahiro Yoneyama3, Shintaro Narita4, Sadafumi Kawamura5, Yasuhiro Kaiho2, Norihiko Tsuchiya4, Tatsuo Tochigi5, Tomonori Habuchi4, Yoichi Arai2, Chikara Ohyama3, Tohru Yoneyama3, Yuki Tobisawa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in high-risk Pca patients treated with a neoadjuvant therapy comprising a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus low dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) (LHRH+EMP) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). In the present study, we used a retrospective design via propensity score matching to elucidate the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP for high-risk Pca.
METHODS: The Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database contained data for 1,268 consecutive Pca patients treated with RP alone at 4 institutions between April 2000 and March 2011 (RP alone group). In the RP alone group, we identified 386 high-risk Pca patients. The neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP group included 274 patients with high-risk Pca treated between September 2005 and November 2013 at Hirosaki University. Neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy included LHRH and EMP administration at a dose of 280 mg/day for 6 months before RP. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and BRFS.
RESULTS: The propensity score-matched analysis indicated 210 matched pairs from both groups. The 5-year BRFS rates were 90.4 and 65.8 % for the neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP and RP alone groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The 5-year OS rates were 100 and 96.1 % for the neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP and RP alone groups, respectively (P = 0.110).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the present study was not randomized, neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy followed by RP appeared to reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence. A prospective randomized study is warranted to determine the clinical implications of the neoadjuvant therapy described here.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-risk prostate cancer; LHRH plus estramustine; Neoadjuvant therapy; Propensity score analysis; Prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25681879     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0802-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  30 in total

Review 1.  High-risk localized prostate cancer: a case for early chemotherapy.

Authors:  Martin Gleave; W Kevin Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.

Authors:  John F Ward; Jeffrey M Slezak; Michael L Blute; Erik J Bergstralh; Horst Zincke
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Efficacy of a second line luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist after advanced prostate cancer biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Kimberly Fernandes; David Bell; Jack Barkin; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Safety and effectiveness of neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate in high-risk prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm study.

Authors:  T Koie; C Ohyama; H Yamamoto; S Hatakeyama; T Yoneyama; Y Hashimoto; N Kamimura
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; Rosalia Viterbo; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Eric M Horwitz; Michael L Blute; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Scott E Eggener; Angel M Serio; Brett S Carver; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Edward M Schaeffer; Bruce J Trock; Jonathan I Epstein; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Death from high-risk prostate cancer versus cardiovascular mortality with hormonal therapy: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Nataniel H Lester-Coll; Samuel Z Goldhaber; David J Sher; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bertram Yuh; Walter Artibani; Axel Heidenreich; Simon Kimm; Mani Menon; Giacomo Novara; Ashutosh Tewari; Karim Touijer; Timothy Wilson; Kevin C Zorn; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Tomás Merino; Ignacio F San Francisco; Pablo A Rojas; Piero Bettoli; Alvaro Zúñiga; Pelayo Besa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  9 in total

1.  Efficacy of a neoadjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate in high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center study.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Hagiwara; Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Atsushi Imai; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Yuki Tobisawa; Tohru Yoneyama
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing vs. non-nerve sparing for high-risk prostate cancer cases.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Takahara; Makoto Sumitomo; Kosuke Fukaya; Takahito Jyoudai; Masashi Nishino; Masaru Hikichi; Kenji Zennami; Takuhisa Nukaya; Manabu Ichino; Naohiko Fukami; Hitomi Sasaki; Mamoru Kusaka; Ryoichi Shiroki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Takuma Narita; Takuya Koie; Teppei Ookubo; Koji Mitsuzuka; Shintaro Narita; Hayato Yamamoto; Takamitsu Inoue; Shingo Hatakeyama; Sadafumi Kawamura; Tatsuo Tochigi; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Cost-effectiveness comparison between neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Teppei Matsumoto; Shingo Hatakeyama; Teppei Ookubo; Koji Mitsuzuka; Shintaro Narita; Takamitsu Inoue; Shinichi Yamashita; Takuma Narita; Takuya Koie; Sadafumi Kawamura; Tatsuo Tochigi; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Overall survival of high-risk prostate cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy at a single institution.

Authors:  Naoki Fujita; Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Yoshimi Tanaka; Osamu Soma; Teppei Matsumoto; Hayato Yamamoto; Atsushi Imai; Yuki Tobisawa; Tohru Yoneyama; Shingo Hatakeyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.

Authors:  Hiromichi Iwamura; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takuma Narita; Yusuke Ozaki; Sakae Konishi; Hirotaka Horiguchi; Hirotake Kodama; Yuta Kojima; Naoki Fujita; Teppei Okamoto; Yuki Tobisawa; Tohru Yoneyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Re-expression of microRNA-4319 inhibits growth of prostate cancer via Her-2 suppression.

Authors:  X Lin; Y Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Redox-Sensitive Nanocomplex for Targeted Delivery of Melittin.

Authors:  Bei Cheng; Peisheng Xu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  The Impact of Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy on Surgical and Oncological Outcomes for Patients With Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Hu Zhao; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Jun Yuan; Yejun Feng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.