Literature DB >> 27390578

Oncologic Outcome of Radical Prostatectomy as Monotherapy for Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer.

Junya Furukawa1, Hideaki Miyake1, Taka-Aki Inoue2, Takayoshi Ogawa3, Hirokazu Tanaka4, Masato Fujisawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to review our experience with radical prostatectomy (RP) as monotherapy for men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 382 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with high-risk PCa according to the D'Amico definition and subsequently underwent RP without neoadjuvant therapy. Biochemical recurrence (BR) was defined as a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥ 0.2 ng/ml on two consecutive measurements, and none of the patients received any adjuvant therapies until their serum PSA levels reached ≥ 0.4 ng/ml. <br> RESULTS: The median preoperative serum PSA level in these 382 patients was 15.9 ng/ml. Pathological stages ≥ pT2c and Gleason scores ≥ 8 were observed in 288 and 194 patients, respectively. During the observation period (median, 48.0 months), BR occurred in 134 patients, and the 5-year BR-free survival rate was 60.1%; however, no patient died of cancer progression. Multivariate analysis identified capsular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, and surgical margin status as independent predictors of BR. <br> CONCLUSIONS: Comparatively favorable cancer control could be achieved using RP as monotherapy for men with high-risk PCa; however, RP alone may be insufficient for patients with capsular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, and/or surgical margin positivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; High-risk prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27390578      PMCID: PMC4911533          DOI: 10.1159/000442856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  25 in total

1.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Case-matched comparison of contemporary radiation therapy to surgery in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sophie G Fletcher; Stacey E Mills; Mark E Smolkin; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Is radical prostatectomy a viable therapeutic option in clinically locally advanced (cT3) prostate cancer?

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; Arnaud Daché; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; Rosalia Viterbo; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Eric M Horwitz; Michael L Blute; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; James A Eastham; Angel M Cronin; Zvi Fuks; Zhigang Zhang; Yoshiya Yamada; Andrew Vickers; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Scott E Eggener; Angel M Serio; Brett S Carver; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  What are the outcomes of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Edward M Schaeffer; Bruce J Trock; Jonathan I Epstein; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chad R Ritch; Chaochen You; Alexandra T May; S Duke Herrell; Peter E Clark; David F Penson; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Joseph A Smith; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The impact of pathologic staging on the long-term oncologic outcomes of patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael R Abern; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Preventing and treating the complications of hormone therapy.

Authors:  Ravi J Kumar; Al Barqawi; E David Crawford
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.862

View more
  3 in total

1.  Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.

Authors:  Pooya Banapour; Andrew Schumacher; Jane C Lin; David S Finley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

2.  The Prognostic Factors of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy

Authors:  Virote Chalieopanyarwong; Worapat Attawettayanon; Watid Kanchanawanichkul; Choosak Pripatnanont
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Jordan Sim; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Eric C Belanger; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.