| Literature DB >> 15819807 |
Javier Briceño1, Javier Padillo, Sebastián Rufián, Guillermo Solórzano, Carlos Pera.
Abstract
Prognosis after liver transplantation depends on a combination of recipient and donor variables. The purpose of this study is to define an allocation system of steatotic donor livers relative to recipient model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. We reviewed 500 consecutive OLT, computing the MELD score for each recipient. Fatty infiltration in grafts was categorized in no steatosis, 10-30%, 30-60% and > or = 60% steatosis. MELD score did not affect preservation injury and graft dysfunction, which were increased with fat content. Recipient and graft survivals lowered when increasing MELD score. Outcome in low-risk recipients (MELD < or = 9) was not altered with steatosis, except those with > or = 60%. Survival functions in moderate-risk recipients (MELD 10-19) were moderately affected with 10-30% steatosis and severely with those with >30. Exactly 30-60% steatotic grafts work poorly in high-risk recipients (MELD > or = 20), and very poorly with > or = 60% steatosis. Prognosis of candidates is optimally influenced when divergence of recipient-donor risks is presented.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15819807 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00091.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transpl Int ISSN: 0934-0874 Impact factor: 3.782