Literature DB >> 21769698

Results of a newborn liver transplant program in the era of piggyback technique and extended donor criteria in Italy.

Giuseppe Maria Ettorre1, Roberto Santoro, Giovanni Vennarecci, Pasquale Lepiane, Mario Antonini, Eugenio Santoro.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to critically analyze the early and long-term results of a newborn liver transplantation (LTx) centre using piggyback technique (PT) without venovenous bypass and portocaval shunt in the era of extended criteria donors (ECDs). Between 2002 and 2010, a total of 229 LTx were performed in 225 patients, with the shortest as possible cold ischemia time (CIT) policy. The charts of the donors and recipients and the intraoperative data were retrospectively reviewed in order to define the feasibility of PT and surgical outcome, and long-term graft and patient survival. PT feasibility rate was 100%, with a median duration of surgery of 390 min (range 210-630) and median unit of packed RBC transfused intraoperatively of 1 U (range 1-10). Median CIT was 400 min (range 130-870), and median AST peak was 403 mmol/L (range 48-16,900). ECDs graft rate was 85%. Over all primary dysfunction and non-function (PNF) rates were 7.4 and 2.2%, respectively and increased with graft steatosis >30% (P < 0.004). Mortality, morbidity, re-operation and re-LTx rates were 4.4, 25, 6.1 and 1.3%, respectively, and median hospital stay was 18 days (range 8-150). On the long term, graft and patient 5-year overall survival were 72 and 74%, respectively, and re-LTx rate was 0.4%. Survival was significantly affected by recipient HCV-Ab seropositive status (67 vs. 85%, P = 0.023). Liver transplantation can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates, despite ECDs. PT is a safe and effective procedure that, combined with short CIT, entailed prompt early functional recovery of the grafts and positive long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769698     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-011-0096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  39 in total

1.  A new technique of side to side caval anastomosis during orthotopic hepatic transplantation without inferior vena caval occlusion.

Authors:  J Belghiti; Y Panis; A Sauvanet; B Gayet; F Fékété
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-09

2.  Liver Match, a prospective observational cohort study on liver transplantation in Italy: study design and current practice of donor-recipient matching.

Authors:  Mario Angelico; Umberto Cillo; Stefano Fagiuoli; Antonio Gasbarrini; Caius Gavrila; Tania Marianelli; Alessandro Nanni Costa; Alessandra Nardi; Mario Strazzabosco; Patrizia Burra; Salvatore Agnes; Umberto Baccarani; Fulvio Calise; Michele Colledan; Oreste Cuomo; Luciano De Carlis; Matteo Donataccio; Giuseppe M Ettorre; Giorgio E Gerunda; Bruno Gridelli; Luigi Lupo; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Antonio Pinna; Andrea Risaliti; Mauro Salizzoni; Giuseppe Tisone; Umberto Valente; Giorgio Rossi; Massimo Rossi; Fausto Zamboni
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.088

3.  Workgroup on expanded criteria organs for liver transplantation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Modified liver hanging maneuver during orthotopic liver transplantation with inferior vena cava preservation: results after 120 consecutive applications.

Authors:  G M Ettorre; G Vennarecci; R Santoro; A Boschetto; L Miglioresi; V Corazza; P Mancini; R Lorusso; D Spoletini; M Antonini; G Tacconi; E Santoro
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Advanced donor age increases the risk of severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Oscar Alonso; Carmelo Loinaz; Enrique Moreno; Carlos Jiménez; Manuel Abradelo; Ramón Gómez; Juan-Carlos Meneu; Carlos Lumbreras; Ignacio García
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.782

6.  Feasibility and limits of split liver transplantation from pediatric donors: an italian multicenter experience.

Authors:  Matteo Cescon; Marco Spada; Michele Colledan; Giuliano Torre; Enzo Andorno; Umberto Valente; Giorgio Rossi; Paolo Reggiani; Umberto Cillo; Umberto Baccarani; Gian Luca Grazi; Giuseppe Tisone; Franco Filipponi; Massimo Rossi; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Mauro Salizzoni; Oreste Cuomo; Tullia De Feo; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A proposal for scoring marginal liver grafts.

Authors:  J Briceño; G Solórzano; C Pera
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Advantages of the piggy back technique on intraoperative transfusion, fluid compsumption, and vasoactive drugs requirements in liver transplantation: a comparative study.

Authors:  E Moreno-Gonzalez; J G Meneu-Diaz; Y Fundora; P Ortega; A Moreno Elola-Olaso; I García García; C Jimenez Romero; C Loinaz; R Gomez Sanz; M Abradelo
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Risk factors for primary dysfunction after liver transplantation--a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  R J Ploeg; A M D'Alessandro; S J Knechtle; M D Stegall; J D Pirsch; R M Hoffmann; T Sasaki; H W Sollinger; F O Belzer; M Kalayoglu
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Predictors of blood product use in orthotopic liver transplantation using the piggyback hepatectomy technique.

Authors:  R S Mangus; S B Kinsella; M M Nobari; J A Fridell; R M Vianna; E S Ward; R Nobari; A J Tector
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.066

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.