Literature DB >> 15814349

Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups.

J A Thomas1.   

Abstract

Conservative estimates suggest that 50-90% of the existing insect species on Earth have still to be discovered, yet the named insects alone comprise more than half of all known species of organism. With such poor baseline knowledge, monitoring change in insect diversity poses a formidable challenge to scientists and most attempts to generalize involve large extrapolations from a few well-studied taxa. Butterflies are often the only group for which accurate measures of change can be obtained. Four schemes, used successfully to assess change in British butterflies, that are increasingly being applied across the world are described: Red Data Books (RDB) list the best judgements of experts of the conservation status of species in their field of expertise; mapping schemes plot the changing distributions of species at scales of 1-100 km2; transect monitoring schemes generate time series of changes in abundance in sample populations of species on fixed sites across the UK; and occasional surveys measure the number, boundaries and size of all populations of a (usually RDB) species at intervals of 10-30 years. All schemes describe consistent patterns of change, but if they are to be more generally useful, it is important to understand how well butterflies are representative of other taxa. Comparisons with similarly measured changes in native bird and plant species suggest that butterflies have declined more rapidly that these other groups in Britain; it should soon be possible to test whether this pattern exists elsewhere. It is also demonstrated that extinction rates in British butterflies are similar to those in a range of other insect groups over 100 years once recording bias is accounted for, although probably lower than in aquatic or parasitic taxa. It is concluded that butterflies represent adequate indicators of change for many terrestrial insect groups, but recommended that similar schemes be extended to other popular groups, especially dragonflies, bumblebees, hoverflies and ants. Given institutional backing, similar projects could be employed internationally and standardized. Finally, a range of schemes designed to monitor change in communities of aquatic macro-invertebrates is described. Although designed to use invertebrates as a bio-indicator of water quality for human use, these programmes could be extended to monitor the 2010 biodiversity targets of the World Summit on Sustainable Development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15814349      PMCID: PMC1569450          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  11 in total

1.  Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change.

Authors:  M S Warren; J K Hill; J A Thomas; J Asher; R Fox; B Huntley; D B Roy; M G Telfer; S Jeffcoate; P Harding; G Jeffcoate; S G Willis; J N Greatorex-Davies; D Moss; C D Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  J A Thomas; N A Bourn; R T Clarke; K E Stewart; D J Simcox; G S Pearman; R Curtis; B Goodger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins.

Authors:  C D Thomas; E J Bodsworth; R J Wilson; A D Simmons; Z G Davies; M Musche; L Conradt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species.

Authors:  Bland J Finlay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Extinction rates and butterflies.

Authors:  Clive Hambler; Martin R Speight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis.

Authors:  J A Thomas; M G Telfer; D B Roy; C D Preston; J J D Greenwood; J Asher; R Fox; R T Clarke; J H Lawton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  How many species are there on Earth?

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The future of biodiversity.

Authors:  S L Pimm; G J Russell; J L Gittleman; T M Brooks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Biological populations with nonoverlapping generations: stable points, stable cycles, and chaos.

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera).

Authors:  Naomi E Pierce; Michael F Braby; Alan Heath; David J Lohman; John Mathew; Douglas B Rand; Mark A Travassos
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

View more
  32 in total

1.  The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Peter Crane; Andy Dobson; Rhys E Green; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Self-similar patterns of nature: insect diversity at local to global scales.

Authors:  Bland J Finlay; Jeremy A Thomas; George C McGavin; Tom Fenchel; Ralph T Clarke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Rainy springs linked to poor nestling growth in a declining avian aerial insectivore ( Tachycineta bicolor).

Authors:  Amelia R Cox; Raleigh J Robertson; Ádám Z Lendvai; Kennedy Everitt; Frances Bonier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The decline of butterflies in Europe: Problems, significance, and possible solutions.

Authors:  Martin S Warren; Dirk Maes; Chris A M van Swaay; Philippe Goffart; Hans Van Dyck; Nigel A D Bourn; Irma Wynhoff; Dan Hoare; Sam Ellis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Species richness and trait composition of butterfly assemblages change along an altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Annette Leingärtner; Jochen Krauss; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Long-term abundance trends of insect taxa are only weakly correlated.

Authors:  Roel van Klink; Diana E Bowler; Konstantin B Gongalsky; Jonathan M Chase
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamics.

Authors:  Piotr Nowicki; Simona Bonelli; Francesca Barbero; Emilio Balletto
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Butterfly larval host plant use in a tropical urban context: life history associations, herbivory, and landscape factors.

Authors:  Ashish D Tiple; Arun M Khurad; Roger L H Dennis
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Mitochondrial DNA indicates late pleistocene divergence of populations of Heteronympha merope, an emerging model in environmental change biology.

Authors:  Melanie Norgate; Jay Chamings; Alexandra Pavlova; James K Bull; Neil D Murray; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Monitoring butterfly abundance: beyond Pollard walks.

Authors:  Jérôme Pellet; Jason T Bried; David Parietti; Antoine Gander; Patrick O Heer; Daniel Cherix; Raphaël Arlettaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.