Literature DB >> 33431566

The decline of butterflies in Europe: Problems, significance, and possible solutions.

Martin S Warren1, Dirk Maes2, Chris A M van Swaay3, Philippe Goffart4, Hans Van Dyck5, Nigel A D Bourn6, Irma Wynhoff3, Dan Hoare6, Sam Ellis6.   

Abstract

We review changes in the status of butterflies in Europe, focusing on long-running population data available for the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Belgium, based on standardized monitoring transects. In the United Kingdom, 8% of resident species have become extinct, and since 1976 overall numbers declined by around 50%. In the Netherlands, 20% of species have become extinct, and since 1990 overall numbers in the country declined by 50%. Distribution trends showed that butterfly distributions began decreasing long ago, and between 1890 and 1940, distributions declined by 80%. In Flanders (Belgium), 20 butterflies have become extinct (29%), and between 1992 and 2007 overall numbers declined by around 30%. A European Grassland Butterfly Indicator from 16 European countries shows there has been a 39% decline of grassland butterflies since 1990. The 2010 Red List of European butterflies listed 38 of the 482 European species (8%) as threatened and 44 species (10%) as near threatened (note that 47 species were not assessed). A country level analysis indicates that the average Red List rating is highest in central and mid-Western Europe and lowest in the far north of Europe and around the Mediterranean. The causes of the decline of butterflies are thought to be similar in most countries, mainly habitat loss and degradation and chemical pollution. Climate change is allowing many species to spread northward while bringing new threats to susceptible species. We describe examples of possible conservation solutions and a summary of policy changes needed to conserve butterflies and other insects.

Keywords:  Europe; butterflies; conservation; insect decline; monitoring

Year:  2021        PMID: 33431566      PMCID: PMC7812787          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002551117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  The race is not to the swift: long-term data reveal pervasive declines in California's low-elevation butterfly fauna.

Authors:  Matthew L Forister; Joshua P Jahner; Kayce L Casner; Joseph S Wilson; Arthur M Shapiro
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Declines in common, widespread butterflies in a landscape under intense human use.

Authors:  Hans Van Dyck; Arco J Van Strien; Dirk Maes; Chris A M Van Swaay
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change.

Authors:  Robert J Wilson; David Gutiérrez; Javier Gutiérrez; David Martínez; Rosa Agudo; Víctor J Monserrat
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Non-target effects of clothianidin on monarch butterflies.

Authors:  Jacob R Pecenka; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-04

5.  A generalized abundance index for seasonal invertebrates.

Authors:  Emily B Dennis; Byron J T Morgan; Stephen N Freeman; Tom M Brereton; David B Roy
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers.

Authors:  Sebastian Seibold; Martin M Gossner; Nadja K Simons; Nico Blüthgen; Jörg Müller; Didem Ambarlı; Christian Ammer; Jürgen Bauhus; Markus Fischer; Jan C Habel; Karl Eduard Linsenmair; Thomas Nauss; Caterina Penone; Daniel Prati; Peter Schall; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Juliane Vogt; Stephan Wöllauer; Wolfgang W Weisser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Nitrogen enrichment in host plants increases the mortality of common Lepidoptera species.

Authors:  Susanne Kurze; Thilo Heinken; Thomas Fartmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations.

Authors:  Caspar A Hallmann; Ruud P B Foppen; Chris A M van Turnhout; Hans de Kroon; Eelke Jongejans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Succession matters: Community shifts in moths over three decades increases multifunctionality in intermediate successional stages.

Authors:  Jan Christian Habel; Andreas H Segerer; Werner Ulrich; Thomas Schmitt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Butterfly abundance declines over 20 years of systematic monitoring in Ohio, USA.

Authors:  Tyson Wepprich; Jeffrey R Adrion; Leslie Ries; Jerome Wiedmann; Nick M Haddad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Arthropods are not declining but are responsive to disturbance in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Timothy D Schowalter; Manoj Pandey; Steven J Presley; Michael R Willig; Jess K Zimmerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Insect decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a thousand cuts.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Eliza M Grames; Matthew L Forister; May R Berenbaum; David Stopak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity.

Authors:  Peter H Raven; David L Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differences in phenology, daily timing of activity, and associations of temperature utilization with survival in three threatened butterflies.

Authors:  Markus Franzén; Yannick Francioli; John Askling; Oskar Kindvall; Victor Johansson; Anders Forsman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Great tits feed their nestlings with more but smaller prey items and fewer caterpillars in cities than in forests.

Authors:  Csenge Sinkovics; Gábor Seress; Ivett Pipoly; Ernő Vincze; András Liker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Phenological sensitivity and seasonal variability explain climate-driven trends in Mediterranean butterflies.

Authors:  Pau Colom; Miquel Ninyerola; Xavier Pons; Anna Traveset; Constantí Stefanescu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Monitoring the dead as an ecosystem indicator.

Authors:  Thomas M Newsome; Brandon Barton; Julia C Buck; Jennifer DeBruyn; Emma Spencer; William J Ripple; Philip S Barton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Decrease in Carabid Beetles in Grasslands of Northwestern China: Further Evidence of Insect Biodiversity Loss.

Authors:  Xueqin Liu; Xinpu Wang; Ming Bai; Josh Jenkins Shaw
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Spatiotemporal Variations in Seed Set and Pollen Limitation in Populations of the Rare Generalist Species Polemonium caeruleum in Poland.

Authors:  Justyna Ryniewicz; Katarzyna Roguz; Paweł Mirski; Emilia Brzosko; Mateusz Skłodowski; Ada Wróblewska; Beata Ostrowiecka; Izabela Tałałaj; Edyta Jermakowicz; Marcin Zych
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Changes in Alpine Butterfly Communities during the Last 40 Years.

Authors:  Simona Bonelli; Cristiana Cerrato; Francesca Barbero; Maria Virginia Boiani; Giorgio Buffa; Luca Pietro Casacci; Lorenzo Fracastoro; Antonello Provenzale; Enrico Rivella; Michele Zaccagno; Emilio Balletto
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.