Literature DB >> 15809778

Analysis of technical surgical errors during initial experience of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy by a group of Dutch pediatric surgeons.

B Tang1, G B Hanna, N M A Bax, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The adoption of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LPM) by pediatric surgeons has been limited due to concerns about long execution times and higher-than-expected morbidity. The aim of the present study was to examine the performance of LPM by pediatric surgeons during the initial stages of their experience.
METHODS: Complete videotapes of 50 early LPM performed in one hospital were subjected to Observational Clinical Human Reliability Analysis (OCHRA) by an independent team.
RESULTS: This series had a total morbidity of 6% (one intraoperative bleed, one gastric perforation, one incomplete pyloromyotomy). Using OCHRA, we identified 77 consequential and 233 inconsequential errors (mean of 6 +/- 5.4 per operation, 16.7% total error probability) during an average operative time of 29.8 min. Eighty percent of the errors were of the execution type. A high probability of error was observed with the use of the following key instruments: holding graspers (68%), retractable blade (79%), and splitting forceps (77%). The OCHRA system confirmed that task III was the hazard zone for LPM. Excessive force (task III) resulted in gastric perforation and bleeding from the pyloric mass. Movement in the wrong direction and misorientation in tissue planes were the external error modes underlying misaligned cuts of the pyloric mass and poor tissue splitting (task zones II and III).
CONCLUSIONS: This early series of LPM was associated with an appreciable execution error rate, largely due to the poor functionality of the specific instruments used for the procedure. Human factors identified by the external error modes played a subsidiary but important role, underscoring the importance of skills training and experience (proficiency-gain curve).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15809778     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8100-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  A comparison of laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Brendan T Campbell; Kelly McLean; Douglas C Barnhart; Robert A Drongowski; Ronald B Hirschl
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.

Authors:  L L Leape; T A Brennan; N Laird; A G Lawthers; A R Localio; B A Barnes; L Hebert; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Is laparoscopic pyloromyotomy superior to open surgery?

Authors:  E Sitsen; N M Bax; D C van der Zee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Complications of pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  F Hulka; M W Harrison; T J Campbell; J R Campbell
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomy versus open pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: which is better?

Authors:  T Fujimoto; G J Lane; O Segawa; S Esaki; T Miyano
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bryony Dean; Mike Schachter; Charles Vincent; Nick Barber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Lest we forget the surgeon.

Authors: 
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2003-09

8.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection.

Authors:  J B Cooper; R S Newbower; R J Kitz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: redefining the advantages of a novel technique.

Authors:  Manuel Caceres; Donald Liu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  18 in total

1.  Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Amjad Parvaiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery. An observational study.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; M van der Elst; T M Karsten; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Thor Milland; Pavlos Papasavas; Aristotelis Dosis; Fernando Bello; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  International consensus on safe techniques and error definitions in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Nicolas J Dedy; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Assessment of specialists in cardiovascular practice.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Hutan Ashrafian; George B Hanna; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  What errors make a laparoscopic cancer surgery unsafe? An ad hoc analysis of competency assessment in the National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England.

Authors:  Melody Ni; Hugh Mackenzie; Adam Widdison; John T Jenkins; Steve Mansfield; Tony Dixon; Dominic Slade; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Nicolas J Dedy; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, the tail of the learning curve.

Authors:  Matthijs Oomen; Roel Bakx; Babette Peeters; Doeke Boersma; Marc Wijnen; Hugo Heij
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Diagnosing barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ken R Catchpole; Elyse Hallett; Sam Curtis; Tannaz Mirchi; Colby P Souders; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  N K Francis; N J Curtis; J A Conti; J D Foster; H J Bonjer; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.