Literature DB >> 12077773

A comparison of laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy at a teaching hospital.

Brendan T Campbell1, Kelly McLean, Douglas C Barnhart, Robert A Drongowski, Ronald B Hirschl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: An increasing number of pediatric surgeons are using the laparoscopic approach to treat pyloric stenosis. The advantage of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is uncertain and has not been evaluated in the setting of a pediatric surgery fellowship program.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent pyloromyotomy for congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at their institution from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2000 (n = 117). Information obtained included age, sex, weight, admission laboratory values, attending surgeon, resident surgeon and their level of training, operating time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, time to full feedings, incidence of postoperative emesis, duration of postoperative emesis, length of stay, and total hospital charges. These variables then were compared between the open (OPEN) and laparoscopic (LAP) groups.
RESULTS: From January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2000, 65 LAP and 52 OPEN pyloromyotomies were performed. Characteristics of patients in the OPEN and LAP groups were similar. The mean operating time was 33 +/- 2 minutes for OPEN versus 38 +/- 2 minutes for LAP (P =.07). The incidence of postoperative emesis (LAP, 68%, OPEN, 65%), duration of postoperative emesis (LAP, 7.3 +/- 1.2 hours; OPEN, 8.1 +/- 1.8 hours), and time to full feedings (LAP, 19.5 +/- 1.6 hours; OPEN, 19.5 +/- 1.3 hours) did not differ significantly between groups (P >.05). Mean postoperative length of stay in both groups was similar (LAP, 31 +/- 5; OPEN, 28 +/- 2 hours; P =.64). Mucosal perforation occurred in 5 patients (8%) in the Lap and 2 patients (4%) in the OPEN group (P =.39). Postoperative complications occurred in 12 LAP (18%) and 6 OPEN patients (12%, P =.31). Five LAP cases were converted to OPEN. In the LAP group there was one unrecognized mucosal perforation and one incomplete pyloromyotomy both of which required reoperation. As the laparoscopic approach was adopted, general surgery resident participation as operating surgeon in these cases decreased from 81% in 1997 to 19% in 2000. Hospital charges were higher in the LAP group, but not significantly (LAP, $6,676 +/- 1,005; OPEN, $5,292 +/- 306; P = 27).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy has progressively become the dominant surgical approach to pyloromyotomy at our institution. The LAP and OPEN approaches have similar outcomes. However, the Lap approach may be associated with increased complication rates, a reduction in general surgery resident operative experience, and higher hospital charges. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12077773     DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.33846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  14 in total

1.  Single-incision pediatric Endosurgical (SIPES) versus conventional laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Can pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis be performed in any hospital? Results from two teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Esther D van den Ende; Jan-Hein Allema; Frans W J Hazebroek; Paul J Breslau
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Jill Van Der Zee; Hock L Tan; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Analysis of technical surgical errors during initial experience of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy by a group of Dutch pediatric surgeons.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; N M A Bax; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  B Jaffray
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Preliminary experience with a new approach for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: the single-port, laparoscopic-assisted pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Mirko Bertozzi; Marco Prestipino; Niccolò Nardi; Antonino Appignani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Early feeding after laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: the pros and cons.

Authors:  J D W van der Bilt; W L M Kramer; D C van der Zee; N M A Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a survey of 407 children.

Authors:  Aurélien Binet; C Klipfel; P Meignan; F Bastard; A R Cook; K Braïk; A Le Touze; T Villemagne; M Robert; Q Ballouhey; F Lengelle; S Amar; H Lardy
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Postoperative Opioid Analgesia Impacts Resource Utilization in Infants Undergoing Pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Anthony I Squillaro; Shadassa Ourshalimian; Cory M McLaughlin; Ashwini Lakshmanan; Philippe Friedlich; Cynthia Gong; Ashley Song; Lorraine I Kelley-Quon
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.