Literature DB >> 15807021

Dominance region for pitch: effects of duration and dichotic presentation.

Hedwig Gockel1, Robert P Carlyon, Christopher J Plack.   

Abstract

The dominance region (DR) for pitch was determined for 16- and 200-ms complex tones containing the first seven harmonics of a fundamental frequency (F0) of 250 Hz. A tone was presented with one of the harmonics mistuned upwards or downwards by 3%, followed 500 ms later by a perfectly harmonic tone of the same duration. Listeners adjusted the F0 of the harmonic tone so that its pitch matched that of the mistuned complex. In experiment 1, stimuli were presented monaurally. The DR was significantly higher in harmonic number for the short than for the long duration. The overall sum of the pitch shifts produced by all harmonics was significantly larger for the short than for the long duration, presumably due to stronger perceptual fusion for the former. In experiment 2, the mistuned harmonic was presented only contralaterally to the remainder of the complex. A similar shift in the DR with duration was observed, although the pitch shifts were smaller than for monaural presentation. There was no significant effect of duration on the overall pitch shifts. The results are discussed in terms of pattern recognition and autocorrelation models of pitch perception, and a role of attention in pitch matching is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15807021     DOI: 10.1121/1.1853111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

Review 1.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Reduced contribution of a nonsimultaneous mistuned harmonic to residue pitch: the role of harmonic number.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Danielle J Zion; Jaclyn R Schurman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Harmonic pitch: dependence on resolved partials, spectral edges, and combination tones.

Authors:  Huanping Dai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Pitch perception: dissociating frequency from fundamental-frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Further examination of pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of Context on the Contribution of Individual Harmonics to Residue Pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Sami Alsindi; Charles Hardy; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.