Literature DB >> 9234873

The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want.

J G Wright1, N L Young.   

Abstract

The Patient-Specific Index is used to assess the outcome of total hip arthroplasty by evaluating the preferences of the individual patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of this index and to compare different methods of combining patients' ratings of the severity and importance of their complaints, to obtain Patient-Specific Index summary scores. All patients who were scheduled to have a total hip arthroplasty performed by one surgeon at a single institution were eligible for the study. The patients completed the Harris hip score form, the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis (MACTAR) Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Patient-Specific Index. With use of the Patient-Specific Index, patients rated the severity and importance of each complaint. These ratings were summed in four different ways to derive severity-importance scores. The questionnaires were completed twice (two weeks apart) before the total hip arthroplasty and twice (two weeks apart) six months after the total hip arthroplasty by a subset of the patients. The seventy-eight participating patients had a mean age of 62.2 years (range, twenty-five to eighty-seven years) at the time of the operation. Forty-three patients (55 per cent) were men, and sixty-three (81 per cent) had osteoarthrosis. The inter-rater and intra-rater test-retest random-effects intraclass correlation coefficients of the Patient-Specific Index were 0.77 or greater (greater than 0.75 is considered excellent). Construct validity was shown by correlations of the Patient-Specific Index with other scales. The additive versions of the Patient-Specific Index (with a responsiveness statistic of 3.3 or greater and a standardized response mean of 1.6 or greater) were more responsive than the other scales. We concluded that the Patient-Specific Index is reliable, valid, and responsive. The additive versions were the most responsive and are recommended for future applications. Such indices need to be tested in studies of patients who have osteoarthrosis of the hip and other musculoskeletal diseases, to ensure generalizability of the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9234873     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199707000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  37 in total

1.  Health related quality of life: a changing construct?

Authors:  Jürg Bernhard; Adam Lowy; Natascha Mathys; Richard Herrmann; Christoph Hürny
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The effect of patient race on total joint replacement recommendations and utilization in the orthopedic setting.

Authors:  Leslie R M Hausmann; Maria Mor; Barbara H Hanusa; Susan Zickmund; Peter Z Cohen; Richard Grant; Denise M Kresevic; Howard S Gordon; Bruce S Ling; C Kent Kwoh; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Development of a new Knee Society scoring system.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Giles R Scuderi; Adam C Brekke; Alla Sikorskii; James B Benjamin; Jess H Lonner; Priya Chadha; Daniel A Daylamani; W Norman Scott; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Validation of a modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Vilai Kuptniratsaikul; Manee Rattanachaiyanont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Cultural Biases in Current Medical Practices with a Specific Attention to Orthopedic Surgery: a Review.

Authors:  Gracia Etienne; Todd P Pierce; Anton Khlopas; Morad Chughtai; Carlos J Lavernia; Teva Y Vogelstein; Craig M Thomas; Charles S Modlin; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-07-17

6.  Does impact sport activity influence total hip arthroplasty durability?

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Solenne Frey; Sebastien Parratte; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians.

Authors:  K E Dreinhöfer; P Dieppe; T Stürmer; D Gröber-Grätz; M Flören; K-P Günther; W Puhl; H Brenner
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  What Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Correlate With Expectations With Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis?

Authors:  Lana Kang; Joseph Nguyen; Sohaib Z Hashmi; Steve K Lee; Andrew J Weiland; Carol A Mancuso
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Willingness and access to joint replacement among African American patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled intervention.

Authors:  Said A Ibrahim; Barbara H Hanusa; Michael J Hannon; Denise Kresevic; Judith Long; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-05

10.  The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Stephane Kämpfen; Urs Munzinger; Ines Kramers-de Quervain
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.