Literature DB >> 20853427

A comparison of the different helices adopted by α- and β-peptides suggests different reasons for their stability.

Jane R Allison1, Marlen Müller, Wilfred F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

The right-handed α-helix is the dominant helical fold of α-peptides, whereas the left-handed 3(14)-helix is the dominant helical fold of β-peptides. Using molecular dynamics simulations, the properties of α-helical α-peptides and 3(14)-helical β-peptides with different C-terminal protonation states and in the solvents water and methanol are compared. The observed energetic and entropic differences can be traced to differences in the polarity of the solvent-accessible surface area and, in particular, the solute dipole moments, suggesting different reasons for their stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20853427      PMCID: PMC3005789          DOI: 10.1002/pro.504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  9 in total

1.  Folding-unfolding thermodynamics of a beta-heptapeptide from equilibrium simulations.

Authors:  X Daura; W F van Gunsteren; A E Mark
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-02-15

2.  Estimating entropies from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Christine Peter; Chris Oostenbrink; Arthur van Dorp; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-02-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Alessandra Villa; Alan E Mark; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  X Daura; B Jaun; D Seebach; W F van Gunsteren; A E Mark
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-07-31       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  What stabilizes the 3(14)-helix in beta3-peptides? A conformational analysis using molecular simulation.

Authors:  Bettina Keller; Zrinka Gattin; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-05-15

8.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.

Authors:  B Lee; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1971-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  The world of beta- and gamma-peptides comprised of homologated proteinogenic amino acids and other components.

Authors:  Dieter Seebach; Albert K Beck; Daniel J Bierbaum
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.408

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Environmental polarity induces conformational transitions in a helical peptide sequence from bacteriophage T4 lysozyme and its tandem duplicate: a molecular dynamics simulation study.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur; Yellamraju U Sasidhar
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Self-assembly of glycerol monooleate with the antimicrobial peptide LL-37: a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  R Innocenti Malini; M Zabara; M Gontsarik; K Maniura-Weber; R M Rossi; F Spano; S Salentinig
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  β-Glutamine-mediated self-association of transmembrane β-peptides within lipid bilayers.

Authors:  U Rost; C Steinem; U Diederichsen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.