Literature DB >> 15803186

Maximum tumor diameter is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in prostate cancer.

Lori E Eichelberger1, Michael O Koch, John N Eble, Thomas M Ulbright, Beth E Juliar, Liang Cheng.   

Abstract

Maximum tumor diameter has been shown to correlate with multiple predictors of clinical outcome in prostate cancer. In the current study, we prospectively analyze whether maximum tumor diameter is a significant predictor of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence. The study population consisted of 364 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Prostatectomy specimens were evaluated by whole-mount processing of the entire prostate. Maximum tumor diameter was measured from the whole-mount sections of the prostate. Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation was used to correlate tumor diameter with continuous variables. T-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to determine if tumor diameter was significantly associated with other clinical and pathologic variables. The effect of clinical and pathologic variables on time to recurrence was analyzed using Cox regression. The mean tumor diameter for all patients was 1.73 cm (range, 0.02-4.40 cm). Maximum tumor diameter was associated with preoperative PSA (r=0.22, P<0.0001), prostate weight (r=-0.12, P=0.028), tumor volume (r=0.87, P<0.0001), Gleason score (r=0.29, P<0.0001), and pathologic stage (P<0.0001). Cox multiple regression was performed to test the prognostic value of maximum tumor diameter adjusting for pathologic stage, Gleason score, and surgical margin status. Increased maximum tumor diameter was associated with shorter time to PSA recurrence (hazard ratio=1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.56, P=0.01), controlling for risk factors, Gleason score, and surgical margin status. We conclude that maximum tumor diameter is a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15803186     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  17 in total

1.  Percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multi-institutional data analysis.

Authors:  Cheryn Song; Seongil Seo; Hanjong Ahn; Seok-Soo Byun; Jin Seon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Eunsik Lee; Hyun Moo Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Biochemical outcome of small-volume or insignificant prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in Japanese population.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Akiko Okamoto; Atsushi Imai; Tohru Yoneyama; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Takuya Koie; Noritaka Kaminura; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Maximum tumor diameter adjusted to the risk profile predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Georg Müller; Malte Rieken; Gernot Bonkat; Joel Roman Gsponer; Tatjana Vlajnic; Christian Wetterauer; Thomas C Gasser; Stephen F Wyler; Alexander Bachmann; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Total intraglandular and index tumor volumes predict biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Su-Jin Shin; Cheol Keun Park; Sung Yoon Park; Won Sik Jang; Joo Yong Lee; Young Deuk Choi; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Yujiro Ito; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Are histopathological features of prostate cancer lesions associated with identification of extracapsular extension on magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Liang Wang; Oguz Akin; Yousef Mazaheri; Nicole M Ishill; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Jingbo Zhang; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Correlation between serum prostate-specific antigen and cancer volume in prostate glands of different sizes.

Authors:  Gustavo F Carvalhal; Saima N Daudi; Donghui Kan; Dana Mondo; Kimberly A Roehl; Stacy Loeb; William J Catalona
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Evaluating the size criterion for PI-RADSv2 category 5 upgrade: is 15 mm the best threshold?

Authors:  Julie Y An; Stephanie A Harmon; Sherif Mehralivand; Marcin Czarniecki; Clayton P Smith; Julie A Peretti; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Joanna H Shih; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-12

9.  Brachytherapy application with in situ dose painting administered by gold nanoparticle eluters.

Authors:  Neeharika Sinha; Gizem Cifter; Erno Sajo; Rajiv Kumar; Srinivas Sridhar; Paul L Nguyen; Robert A Cormack; G Mike Makrigiorgos; Wilfred Ngwa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The independent value of tumour volume in a contemporary cohort of men treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease.

Authors:  Sima P Porten; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.