AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg administered once daily in the morning compared with the evening. METHODS: This was a randomized, two-way, cross-over study in HIV+ subjects. In each subject the pharmacokinetics of each drug were characterized after 2 weeks of LPV/r 800/200 mg administered once daily at 08.00 h and 19.00 h. On study days, LPV/r was taken with a standardized meal (800 kCal, 25% from fat) after fasting for at least 5 h. LPV/r concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS, and the data were analyzed by noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS:Fourteen subjects completed the study (all men, mean age/weight 44 year/81 kg). The median (interquartile range) LPV AUC(0,24 h), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (C(24 h)) after am and pm dosing was, respectively, 143 (116-214) mg l(-1) h, 12.8 (10.3-17.2) mg l(-1), 1.34 (0.58-3.25) mg l(-1), and 171 (120-232) mg l(-1) h, 12.9 (8.22-16.3) mg l(-1), 1.15 (0.59-1.98) mg l(-1). The geometric mean ratio (GMR, am : pm) and 95% CI of the LPV AUC(0,24 h), C(max), and C(24 h) was 0.91 (0.79, 1.06), 1.11 (0.94, 1.32), and 1.19 (0.72, 1.96), respectively. The median ritonavir C(max) after am and pm dosing was 1.05 and 0.90 mg l(-1), respectively. The GMR (95% CI) of the RTV AUC(0,24 h), C(max), and C(24 h) was 0.93 (0.80, 1.08), 1.27 (1.00, 1.63), and 1.04 (0.68, 1.60), respectively. Administration of LPV/r in a once-daily regimen was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in the pharmacokinetics of LPV/r after am or pm dosing with food, which suggests that this once daily combination, can be taken in the morning or evening. Such flexibility in dosing may improve adherence.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To compare the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg administered once daily in the morning compared with the evening. METHODS: This was a randomized, two-way, cross-over study in HIV+ subjects. In each subject the pharmacokinetics of each drug were characterized after 2 weeks of LPV/r 800/200 mg administered once daily at 08.00 h and 19.00 h. On study days, LPV/r was taken with a standardized meal (800 kCal, 25% from fat) after fasting for at least 5 h. LPV/r concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS, and the data were analyzed by noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen subjects completed the study (all men, mean age/weight 44 year/81 kg). The median (interquartile range) LPV AUC(0,24 h), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (C(24 h)) after am and pm dosing was, respectively, 143 (116-214) mg l(-1) h, 12.8 (10.3-17.2) mg l(-1), 1.34 (0.58-3.25) mg l(-1), and 171 (120-232) mg l(-1) h, 12.9 (8.22-16.3) mg l(-1), 1.15 (0.59-1.98) mg l(-1). The geometric mean ratio (GMR, am : pm) and 95% CI of the LPV AUC(0,24 h), C(max), and C(24 h) was 0.91 (0.79, 1.06), 1.11 (0.94, 1.32), and 1.19 (0.72, 1.96), respectively. The median ritonavir C(max) after am and pm dosing was 1.05 and 0.90 mg l(-1), respectively. The GMR (95% CI) of the RTV AUC(0,24 h), C(max), and C(24 h) was 0.93 (0.80, 1.08), 1.27 (1.00, 1.63), and 1.04 (0.68, 1.60), respectively. Administration of LPV/r in a once-daily regimen was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in the pharmacokinetics of LPV/r after am or pm dosing with food, which suggests that this once daily combination, can be taken in the morning or evening. Such flexibility in dosing may improve adherence.
Authors: David Back; Giorgio Gatti; Courtney Fletcher; Rodolphe Garaffo; Richard Haubrich; Richard Hoetelmans; Michael Kurowski; Andrew Luber; Concepta Merry; Carlo-Federico Perno Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Vincent Le Moing; Geneviève Chêne; Maria P Carrieri; Ahmadou Alioum; Françoise Brun-Vézinet; Lionel Piroth; Jill P Cassuto; Jean-Paul Moatti; François Raffi; Catherine Leport Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-01-04 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Michael Kurowski; B Kaeser; A Sawyer; M Popescu; A Mroziekiewicz; A Arslan; S Staszewski Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2002-10-29 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Constance A Benson; Steven G Deeks; Scott C Brun; Roy M Gulick; Joseph J Eron; Harold A Kessler; Robert L Murphy; Charles Hicks; Martin King; David Wheeler; Judith Feinberg; Richard Stryker; Paul E Sax; Sharon Riddler; Melanie Thompson; Kathryn Real; Ann Hsu; Dale Kempf; Anthony J Japour; Eugene Sun Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-14 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: H L Sham; D J Kempf; A Molla; K C Marsh; G N Kumar; C M Chen; W Kati; K Stewart; R Lal; A Hsu; D Betebenner; M Korneyeva; S Vasavanonda; E McDonald; A Saldivar; N Wideburg; X Chen; P Niu; C Park; V Jayanti; B Grabowski; G R Granneman; E Sun; A J Japour; J M Leonard; J J Plattner; D W Norbeck Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sharon Walmsley; Barry Bernstein; Martin King; José Arribas; Gildon Beall; Peter Ruane; Margaret Johnson; David Johnson; Richard Lalonde; Anthony Japour; Scott Brun; Eugene Sun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chao Zhang; Paolo Denti; Eric Decloedt; Gary Maartens; Mats O Karlsson; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Helen McIlleron Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: José Moltó; Manuel José Barbanoj; Cristina Miranda; Asunción Blanco; José Ramón Santos; Eugenia Negredo; Joan Costa; Pere Domingo; Bonaventura Clotet; Marta Valle Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2008 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: A G Habib; J C Shepherd; M K L Eng; M Babashani; J Jumare; U Yakubu; U I Gebi; M Saad; H Ibrahim; W A Blattner Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2008-06-03