Literature DB >> 12087139

Lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir for the initial treatment of HIV infection.

Sharon Walmsley1, Barry Bernstein, Martin King, José Arribas, Gildon Beall, Peter Ruane, Margaret Johnson, David Johnson, Richard Lalonde, Anthony Japour, Scott Brun, Eugene Sun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lopinavir is a newly developed inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease that, when formulated with ritonavir, yields mean trough plasma lopinavir concentrations that are at least 75 times as high as that needed to inhibit replication of wild-type HIV by 50 percent.
METHODS: We conducted a double-blind trial in which 653 HIV-infected adults who had not received antiretroviral therapy for more than 14 days were randomly assigned to receive either lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg of lopinavir plus 100 mg of ritonavir twice daily) with nelfinavir placebo or nelfinavir (750 mg three times daily) with lopinavir-ritonavir placebo. All patients also received open-label stavudine and lamivudine. The primary efficacy end points were the presence of fewer than 400 HIV RNA copies per milliliter of plasma at week 24 and the time to the loss of virologic response through week 48.
RESULTS: At week 48, greater proportions of patients treated with lopinavir-ritonavir than of patients treated with nelfinavir had fewer than 400 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter (75 percent vs. 63 percent, P<0.001) and fewer than 50 copies per milliliter (67 percent vs. 52 percent, P<0.001). The time to the loss of virologic response was greater in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than in the nelfinavir group (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.7; P<0.001). The estimated proportion of patients with a persistent virologic response through week 48 was 84 percent for patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir and 66 percent for those receiving nelfinavir. Both regimens were well tolerated, with the rate of discontinuation related to the study drugs at 3.4 percent among patients receiving lopinavir-ritonavir and 3.7 percent among patients receiving nelfinavir. Among patients with more than 400 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter at some point from week 24 through week 48, resistance mutations in HIV protease were demonstrated in viral isolates from 25 of 76 nelfinavir-treated patients (33 percent) and none of 37 patients treated with lopinavir-ritonavir (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: For the initial treatment of HIV-infected adults, a combination regimen that includes lopinavir-ritonavir is well tolerated and has antiviral activity superior to that of a nelfinavir-containing regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12087139     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  125 in total

1.  Outcomes of patients on dual-boosted PI regimens: experience of the Swiss HIV cohort study.

Authors:  Regina B Osih; Patrick Taffé; Martin Rickenbach; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Luigia Elzi; Christoph Fux; Milos Opravil; Enos Bernasconi; Patrick Schmid; Huldrych F Günthard; Matthias Cavassini
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.205

2.  Antiretroviral therapy for adults infected with HIV: Guidelines for health care professionals from the Quebec HIV care committee.

Authors:  Danielle Rouleau; Claude Fortin; Benoît Trottier; Richard Lalonde; Normand Lapointe; Pierre Côté; Jean-Pierre Routy; Marie-France Matte; Irina Tsarevsky; Jean-Guy Baril
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 3.  Minority variants of drug-resistant HIV.

Authors:  Sara Gianella; Douglas D Richman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Instantaneous inhibitory potential is similar to inhibitory quotient at predicting HIV-1 response to antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Timothy J Henrich; Heather J Ribaudo; Daniel R Kuritzkes
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  US cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected adults with evidence of protease inhibitor resistance included in the TITAN Trial.

Authors:  Anita Brogan; Josephine Mauskopf; Sandra E Talbird; Erik Smets
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive, protease inhibitor-resistant, HIV-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.

Authors:  Karen Moeremans; Lindsay Hemmett; Jonas Hjelmgren; Gabriele Allegri; Erik Smets
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir in highly treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults in the USA.

Authors:  Josephine Mauskopf; Anita Brogan; Silas Martin; Erik Smets
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Durable HIV RNA resuppression after virologic failure while remaining on a first-line regimen: a cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher J Hoffmann; Salome Charalambous; Alison D Grant; Lynn Morris; Gavin J Churchyard; Richard E Chaisson
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Importance of substituents in ring opening: a DFT study on a model reaction of thiazole to thioamide.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Dan Qin; Lijun Yang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Evolution of HIV resistance mutations in patients maintained on a stable treatment regimen after virologic failure.

Authors:  Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Monique R Ferguson; Xueliang Han; Greg McMillan; Marty St Clair; Keith A Pappa; Daniel R McClernon; William A O'Brien
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.