Literature DB >> 15792507

Clinical experience with the intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitoring Codman MicroSensor system.

Lars-Owe D Koskinen1, Magnus Olivecrona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to study the reliability of the Codman MicroSensor (CMS), used for intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements, as it is used in a clinical setting. In particular, the drift from zero was studied.
METHODS: The investigation is a prospective study of 128 patients with a need for neurointensive care who have been treated for various diseases. The patients received an intraparenchymal CMS device, and the zero drift was measured at explantation of the sensor. In another 22 patients, the ICP was recorded simultaneously from a ventriculostomy and a CMS, and the values were compared. The general data of complications and pitfalls are collected from close to 1000 CMS devices implanted.
RESULTS: The CMS was used, on average, 7.2 +/- 0.4 days per patient. The total time of ICP measurement was 20,040 hours, resulting in at least 7.2 x 10(7) measuring values displayed. The drift from zero was 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm Hg, and no correlation with duration of use was found (P = 0.9, r = 0.002). There was a good correlation between ICP measured by CMS and by ventriculostomy (P < 0.0001, r = 0.79). The average ICP measured with the ventriculostomy was 18.3 +/- 0.3 mm Hg, and with the CMS, it was 19.0 +/- 0.2 mm Hg. A few minor hematomas were identified, and no infections directly connected to the device were observed. Some pitfalls in handling and problems during magnetic resonance imaging investigations are discussed.
CONCLUSION: In our hands, the CMS device is reliable and easy to use. The ICP recordings are stable over time, and there is only a minor zero drift. The device is today our standard method for ICP measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15792507     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000156609.95596.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  29 in total

1.  Significant improvement of intractable headache after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenomas; preoperative neuroradiological evaluation and intraoperative intrasellar pressure measurement.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Hayashi; Daisuke Kita; Masayuki Iwato; Issei Fukui; Masahiro Oishi; Taishi Tsutsui; Osamu Tachibana; Mitsutoshi Nakada
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  NICEM consensus on neurological monitoring in acute neurological disease.

Authors:  Peter J D Andrews; Giuseppe Citerio; Luca Longhi; Kees Polderman; Juan Sahuquillo; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy; Anthony A Figaji; M R Bullock
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Differentiate the Source and Site of Intracranial Pressure Measurements Using More Precise Nomenclature.

Authors:  DaiWai M Olson; Stefany Ortega Peréz; Jonathan Ramsay; Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao; Jose I Suarez; Molly McNett; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  In vivo accuracy of two intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitors.

Authors:  Thomas Lescot; Vincent Reina; Yannick Le Manach; Filippo Boroli; Dorian Chauvet; Anne-Laure Boch; Louis Puybasset
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Continuous monitoring of the Monro-Kellie doctrine: is it possible?

Authors:  Dong-Joo Kim; Zofia Czosnyka; Magdalena Kasprowicz; Piotr Smieleweski; Oliver Baledent; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; John D Pickard; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Traumatic brain injury: Intracranial pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Bertil Romner; Per-Olof Grände
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Model-based noninvasive estimation of intracranial pressure from cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial pressure.

Authors:  Faisal M Kashif; George C Verghese; Vera Novak; Marek Czosnyka; Thomas Heldt
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Prospective Study on Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain-Injured Patients: Comparison of Four Methods.

Authors:  Danilo Cardim; Chiara Robba; Joseph Donnelly; Michal Bohdanowicz; Bernhard Schmidt; Maxwell Damian; Georgios V Varsos; Xiuyun Liu; Manuel Cabeleira; Gustavo Frigieri; Brenno Cabella; Peter Smielewski; Sergio Mascarenhas; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  An intracranial pressure-derived index monitored simultaneously from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.