Literature DB >> 15787325

Routine ureteral dilatation is not necessary for ureteroscopy.

Ali Unsal1, Ersin Cimentepe, M Derya Balbay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present our experience in ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stone extraction without ureteral dilatation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 134 consecutive patients (80 male and 54 female), with a mean age of 36.4 (18-65) years underwent ureteroscopic stone removal. The stones were located in the lower, middle, and upper parts of the ureter in 92, 18 and 24 patients and the mean stone diameters were 9.2 (6-15) mm, 10.5 (8-15) mm and 8.8 (8-10) mm, respectively. A semirigid ureteroscope 8 F in size was used without any ureteral dilatation. The stones were fragmented by a pneumatic lithotripter in the ureter and the fragments were removed by a basket catheter or stone forceps. All patients were re-evaluated with a plain film on postoperative first day and with intravenous urography (IVU) at 3 months. Residual fragments bigger than 3 mm were accepted as treatment failure.
RESULTS: The mean operation time was 44 (20-120) minutes. After the operation, the stone-free rate was 89/92 (97%) for lower, 15/18 (83%) middle and 18/24 (75%) upper ureteral stones, respectively. Double J catheter replacement was needed in 13 patients due to impacted stone and/or failed procedure. Ureteral perforation did not occur in any patient. Patients were discharched from hospital within 6-24 hours. No ureteral stricture was encountered during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that ureteroscopic interventions could be easily performed for all parts of ureter without previous dilatation of the ureter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15787325     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-004-0860-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  R Peschel; G Janetschek; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Matthew T Gettman; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  In situ SWL of ureteral stones: comparison between an electrohydraulic and an electromagnetic shockwave source.

Authors:  Geert G Tailly
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy.

Authors:  C P Chang; S H Huang; H L Tai; B F Wang; M Y Yen; K H Huang; H J Jiang; J Lin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Ureteral dilation using a tapered dilator: a cost-effective approach.

Authors:  F Gaylis; M Bastuba; M Bidair; W Friedel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Ureteroscopy with intravenous sedation for treatment of distal ureteral calculi: a safe and effective alternative to shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  D H Hosking; R J Bard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Transureteral lithotripsy in pediatric practice.

Authors:  A Bassiri; H Ahmadnia; M R Darabi; M Yonessi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; G Schubert; T Rosenkranz; A Weigl
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral stones: over 10 years' experience.

Authors:  L Jeromin; M Sosnowski
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of sequential balloon dilation prior to ureteral access sheath insertion in nonstented patients undergoing ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Amr Elmekresh; Lawrence Tsai; Victor Villarreal; Zain Hyder; Patrick S Lowry; Marawan M El Tayeb
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 2.  Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications.

Authors:  P P Lumma; P Schneider; A Strauss; K D Plothe; P Thelen; R H Ringert; H Loertzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.