Literature DB >> 11552776

Optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy.

C P Chang1, S H Huang, H L Tai, B F Wang, M Y Yen, K H Huang, H J Jiang, J Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi remains controversial. We present data from our institution to compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy with different lithotripsy modalities (URSL).
METHODS: From January 1994 to September 1997, 954 distal ureteral calculi were treated at our institution using in situ SWL (Siemens Lithostar) in 524 patients and ureteroscopy (Wolf 8.0F instrument and Swiss Lithoclast) in 430 patients. Stone sizes and patient ages were similar in these two groups.
RESULTS: In the SWL group, the 3-month stone-free rate was 87%, and the effectiveness quotient (EQ) was 68.7%. In the URSL group, there was a 96% stone-free rate with an EQ of 92.1%. The SWL treatment was more expensive than URSL.
CONCLUSION: At our institution, ureteroscopy is more efficacious than SWL for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. In selected patients who had stones >10 mm with evidence of impaction and severe colic pain, we strongly suggest that URSL is the best choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11552776     DOI: 10.1089/089277901750426292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of postoperative hydronephrosis following semirigid ureteroscopy: Incidence and predictors.

Authors:  Mehmet İlker Gökçe; Barış Esen; Başak Gülpınar; Adil Hüseynov; Mete Özkidik; Evren Süer
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  Low dose lignocaine + butorphanol vs. low dose bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in day care urological surgeries: a prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Shahil Rameshbhai Khant; Rajeev Chaudhari; Rishikesh Arun Kore; Shirish Bhagwat; Ranjan Purushottam Jakhalekar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

3.  Treatment of impacted lower third ureteral stones with the use of the ureteral access sheath.

Authors:  Nick P Pardalidis; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Christos G Kapotis; Eleni V Kosmaoglou
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-14

4.  Socioeconomic evaluation of the treatment of ureteral lithiasis.

Authors:  T Rombi; A Triantafyllidis; A Fotas; T Konstantinidis; S Touloupidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Routine ureteral dilatation is not necessary for ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Ali Unsal; Ersin Cimentepe; M Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study.

Authors:  P Honeck; A Häcker; P Alken; M S Michel; T Knoll
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-01-31

Review 7.  Economic outcomes of treatment for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Jeroen P Jansen; Lisa M Meckley; Thomas W Byrne; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Does stone dimension affect the effectiveness of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in distal ureteral stones?

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Ali Ihsan Taşci; Emin Ozbek; Bekir Aras; Levent Verim; Levent Gürkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Economic Considerations in the Management of Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Daniel Roberson; Colin Sperling; Ankur Shah; Justin Ziemba
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  A Systematic Review on Comparative Analyses between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Ureter Stone According to Stone Size.

Authors:  Hae Do Jung; Youna Hong; Joo Yong Lee; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.