Literature DB >> 15782513

A method for detecting runs of good and bad clinical outcomes on Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) charts.

Chris Sherlaw-Johnson1.   

Abstract

In recent years there has been a growing need for effective monitoring of clinical outcomes. Two techniques for continuous monitoring that have emerged almost simultaneously are the Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) and risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts (CUSUM). The VLAD provides clinicians and management with an easily understandable overview of outcome history and is now in routine use in several hospitals. Although it can indicate runs of good and bad outcomes, unlike the CUSUM, it does not provide a quantitative means for assessing whether they merit investigation. This paper introduces a scheme for applying control limits from CUSUM charts onto the VLAD, thus enhancing its role as an effective monitoring tool.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15782513     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-005-5217-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  13 in total

1.  The application of statistical process control charts to the detection and monitoring of hospital-acquired infections.

Authors:  A P Morton; M Whitby; M L McLaws; A Dobson; S McElwain; D Looke; J Stackelroth; A Sartor
Journal:  J Qual Clin Pract       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  Values and leadership.

Authors:  David Pendleton; Jennifer King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

3.  Surgical performance measurement.

Authors:  Tom Treasure; Oswaldo Valencia; Chris Sherlaw-Johnson; Steve Gallivan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2002-11

4.  Following Shipman: a pilot system for monitoring mortality rates in primary care.

Authors:  Paul Aylin; Nicky Best; Alex Bottle; Clare Marshall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display.

Authors:  J Lovegrove; O Valencia; T Treasure; C Sherlaw-Johnson; S Gallivan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A simple benchmark for evaluating quality of care of patients following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M F Dorsch; R A Lawrance; R J Sapsford; J Oldham; D C Greenwood; B M Jackson; C Morrell; S G Ball; M B Robinson; A S Hall
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Use of cumulative mortality data in patients with acute myocardial infarction for early detection of variation in clinical practice: observational study.

Authors:  R A Lawrance; M F Dorsch; R J Sapsford; A F Mackintosh; D C Greenwood; B M Jackson; C Morrell; M B Robinson; A S Hall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-11

8.  Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts.

Authors:  O A Grigg; V T Farewell; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery.

Authors:  David Spiegelhalter; Olivia Grigg; Robin Kinsman; Tom Treasure
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Monitoring the evolutionary process of quality: risk-adjusted charting to track outcomes in intensive care.

Authors:  David A Cook; Stefan H Steiner; Richard J Cook; Vern T Farewell; Anthony P Morton
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  Risk-adjusted number-between failures charting procedures for monitoring a patient care process for acute myocardial infarctions.

Authors:  Fah Fatt Gan; Tess Tan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Comparison of control charts for monitoring clinical performance using binary data.

Authors:  Jenny Neuburger; Kate Walker; Chris Sherlaw-Johnson; Jan van der Meulen; David A Cromwell
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Significance of likes: Analysing passive interactions on Facebook during campaigning.

Authors:  Mohammad Adib Khairuddin; Asha Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Learning Curve of Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation in Treating End-Stage Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis: A RA-CUSUM Analysis.

Authors:  Yiwen Qiu; Xianwei Yang; Tao Wang; Shu Shen; Yi Yang; Bin Huang; Wentao Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-11-30

5.  Application of Variable Life Adjusted Displays (VLAD) on Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED).

Authors:  Nick Andrianopoulos; Damien Jolley; Sue M Evans; Caroline A Brand; Peter A Cameron
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Monitoring clinical quality in rare disease services--experience in England.

Authors:  Thomas D Kenny; Edmund G Jessop; William H Gutteridge
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Real time monitoring of risk-adjusted paediatric cardiac surgery outcomes using variable life-adjusted display: implementation in three UK centres.

Authors:  Christina Pagel; Martin Utley; Sonya Crowe; Thomas Witter; David Anderson; Ray Samson; Andrew McLean; Victoria Banks; Victor Tsang; Katherine Brown
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Debate: what is the best method to monitor surgical performance?

Authors:  Stefan H Steiner; William H Woodall
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Improvement Science in Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Duncan T Wagstaff; James Bedford; S Ramani Moonesinghe
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.