Literature DB >> 11454829

A simple benchmark for evaluating quality of care of patients following acute myocardial infarction.

M F Dorsch1, R A Lawrance, R J Sapsford, J Oldham, D C Greenwood, B M Jackson, C Morrell, S G Ball, M B Robinson, A S Hall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple risk model as a basis for evaluating care of patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS: From coronary care registers, biochemistry records and hospital management systems, 2153 consecutive patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction were identified. With 30 day all cause mortality as the end point, a multivariable logistic regression model of risk was constructed and validated in independent patient cohorts. The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated as an assessment of sensitivity and specificity. The model was reapplied to a number of commonly studied subgroups for further assessment of robustness.
RESULTS: A three variable model was developed based on age, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure on admission. This produced an individual probability of death by 30 days (P(30)) where P(30) = 1/(1 + exp(-L(30))) and L(30) = -5.624 + (0.085 x age) + (0.014 x heart rate) - (0.022 x systolic blood pressure). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the reference and test cohorts were 0.79 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.82) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.79), respectively. To aid application of the model to routine clinical audit, a normogram relating observed mortality and sample size to the likelihood of a significant deviation from the expected 30 day mortality rate was constructed.
CONCLUSIONS: This risk model is simple, reproducible, and permits quality of care of acute myocardial infarction patients to be reliably evaluated both within and between centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11454829      PMCID: PMC1729848          DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.2.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  17 in total

1.  Predicting in-hospital mortality. A comparison of severity measurement approaches.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; G A Coffman; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Pennsylvania's Focus on Heart Attack--grading the scorecard.

Authors:  J G Jollis; P S Romano
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: the influence of the severity-adjustment method.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; M Shwartz; J Daley; J S Hughes; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK)

Authors:  J Collinson; M D Flather; K A Fox; I Findlay; E Rodrigues; P Dooley; P Ludman; J Adgey; T J Bowker; R Mattu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Change in ST segment elevation 60 minutes after thrombolytic initiation predicts clinical outcome as accurately as later electrocardiographic changes.

Authors:  I F Purcell; N Newall; M Farrer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  League tables and acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A H Leyland; F A Boddy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Multivessel coronary artery disease: a key predictor of short-term prognosis after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group.

Authors:  D W Muller; E J Topol; S G Ellis; K N Sigmon; K Lee; R M Califf
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. GUSTO-I Investigators.

Authors:  K L Lee; L H Woodlief; E J Topol; W D Weaver; A Betriu; J Col; M Simoons; P Aylward; F Van de Werf; R M Califf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Using admission characteristics to predict short-term mortality from myocardial infarction in elderly patients. Results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

Authors:  S T Normand; M E Glickman; R G Sharma; B J McNeil
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Who would I not give IIb/IIIa inhibitors to during percutaneous coronary intervention?

Authors:  J M McLenachan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A method for detecting runs of good and bad clinical outcomes on Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) charts.

Authors:  Chris Sherlaw-Johnson
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

Review 3.  Risk stratification for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Richard A Brogan; Christopher J Malkin; Phillip D Batin; Alexander D Simms; James M McLenachan; Christopher P Gale
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-26

4.  A prognostic nomogram for long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Shuting Kong; Changxi Chen; Gaoshu Zheng; Hui Yao; Junfeng Li; Hong Ye; Xiaobo Wang; Xiang Qu; Xiaodong Zhou; Yucheng Lu; Hao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Significance of likes: Analysing passive interactions on Facebook during campaigning.

Authors:  Mohammad Adib Khairuddin; Asha Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Generalizability of Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Prediction Models: 158 Independent External Validations of 104 Unique Models.

Authors:  Gaurav Gulati; Jenica Upshaw; Benjamin S Wessler; Riley J Brazil; Jason Nelson; David van Klaveren; Christine M Lundquist; Jinny G Park; Hannah McGinnes; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ben Van Calster; David M Kent
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-31

7.  The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence.

Authors:  F Lateef; A Annathurai; T T Loh
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-15

8.  A Nomogram Based on Apelin-12 for the Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention among Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Enfa Zhao; Hang Xie; Yushun Zhang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.023

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.