Literature DB >> 15781892

Echolocation call intensity in the aerial hawking bat Eptesicus bottae (Vespertilionidae) studied using stereo videogrammetry.

Marc W Holderied1, Carmi Korine, M Brock Fenton, Stuart Parsons, Stuart Robson, Gareth Jones.   

Abstract

Aerial hawking bats use intense echolocation calls to search for insect prey. Their calls have evolved into the most intense airborne animal vocalisations. Yet our knowledge about call intensities in the field is restricted to a small number of species. We describe a novel stereo videogrammetry method used to study flight and echolocation behaviour, and to measure call source levels of the aerial hawking bat Eptesicus bottae (Vespertilionidae). Bats flew close to their predicted minimum power speed. Source level increased with call duration; the loudest call of E. bottae was at 133 dB peSPL. The calculated maximum detection distance for large flying objects (e.g. large prey, conspecifics) was up to 21 m. The corresponding maximum echo delay is almost exactly the duration of one wing beat in E. bottae and this also is its preferred pulse interval. These results, obtained by using videogrammetry to track bats in the field, corroborate earlier findings from other species from acoustic tracking methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15781892     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  23 in total

1.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A bony connection signals laryngeal echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Nina Veselka; David D McErlain; David W Holdsworth; Judith L Eger; Rethy K Chhem; Matthew J Mason; Kirsty L Brain; Paul A Faure; M Brock Fenton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Thoracic scales of moths as a stealth coating against bat biosonar.

Authors:  Thomas R Neil; Zhiyuan Shen; Daniel Robert; Bruce W Drinkwater; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Click-based echolocation in bats: not so primitive after all.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Maya Geva-Sagiv; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Variability in echolocation call intensity in a community of horseshoe bats: a role for resource partitioning or communication?

Authors:  Maike Schuchmann; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How greater mouse-eared bats deal with ambiguous echoic scenes.

Authors:  M L Melcón; Y Yovel; A Denzinger; H-U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Simon Boel Pedersen; Lasse Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.