Literature DB >> 1577997

Visual factors in sound localization in mammals.

R S Heffner1, H E Heffner.   

Abstract

The ability of mammals to localize sound varies widely among species. During the past decade, evidence has accumulated that this variation cannot be accounted for simply on the basis of the availability of the physical cues for locus. Evidence is presented that a major factor in sound localization is the need to direct the field of best vision to a sound source for further scrutiny. Thus, species with broad fields of best vision (such as visual streaks) require less accurate information regarding the location of a sound source than do species with very narrow fields of best vision (such as foveae). To support this suggestion, data are reported for the width of the field of best vision in the form of retinal ganglion cell isodensity contours for thirteen species of mammals. The possible contribution of other factors including binocular fields, visual acuity, and the degree to which a species is predatory in lifestyle, is also examined.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1577997     DOI: 10.1002/cne.903170302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  31 in total

1.  Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud Falchier; Simon Clavagnier; Pascal Barone; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Long-distance feedback projections to area V1: implications for multisensory integration, spatial awareness, and visual consciousness.

Authors:  Simon Clavagnier; Arnaud Falchier; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Use of binaural cues for sound localization in large and small non-echolocating bats: Eidolon helvum and Cynopterus brachyotis.

Authors:  Rickye S Heffner; Gimseong Koay; Henry E Heffner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Volumes of cochlear nucleus regions in rodents.

Authors:  Donald A Godfrey; Augustine C Lee; Walter D Hamilton; Louis C Benjamin; Shilpa Vishwanath; Hermann Simo; Lynn M Godfrey; Abdurrahman I A A Mustapha; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  The distributed auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jeffery A Winer; Charles C Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Authors:  Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Can measures of sound localization acuity be related to the precision of absolute location estimates?

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The vestibulo-auricular reflex.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Exploring the mammalian sensory space: co-operations and trade-offs among senses.

Authors:  Sirpa Nummela; Henry Pihlström; Kai Puolamäki; Mikael Fortelius; Simo Hemilä; Tom Reuter
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.