Literature DB >> 18595569

Using focus groups to adapt ethnically appropriate, information-seeking and recruitment messages for a prostate cancer screening program for men at high risk.

Charlene J Bryan1, Lindsay Wetmore-Arkader, Tammy Calvano, Janet A Deatrick, Veda N Giri, Deborah Watkins Bruner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To adapt ethnically appropriate radio and newspaper messages in order to increase information-seeking and recruitment to the high-risk Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program (PRAP) using input from focus groups.
METHODS: We conducted four gender- and ethnic specific-focus groups composed of up to eight participants each. Group participants ranged in age from 35-69 and were either at risk for prostate cancer or were married to someone at risk. Participants evaluated both print and radio advertisements for a PRAP media recruitment campaign, and their recommendations were used to adapt the advertisements.
RESULTS: Trigger words, e.g,, "research program," were found to be a particular issue for African-American men who cited concerns about "experimentation," while the other groups cited concerns about time commitments and cost. In the print messages, familial themes garnered an overall favorable response, but Caucasian-American participants responded negatively to the use of photos of age-appropriate models.
CONCLUSION: Focus groups are useful in checking health professional assumptions about health messages prior to developing awareness or recruitment advertisements or materials. There was an implied preference for "younger" models among Caucasian Americans. Radio and print messages were adapted using the focus group recommendations, i.e., focusing on familial themes, adding race-specific risk estimates and using younger-than-target group models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18595569      PMCID: PMC2700360          DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31340-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  28 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Screening for cancer: evaluating the evidence.

Authors:  T J Gates
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 3.  Maintaining your focus in focus groups: avoiding common mistakes.

Authors:  Denise Côté-Arsenault; Dianne Morrison-Beedy
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 4.  The use of focus group methodology in health disparities research.

Authors:  Coralease C Ruff; Ivy M Alexander; Charmaine McKie
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?

Authors:  Dwayne T Brandon; Lydia A Isaac; Thomas A LaVeist
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  PSA testing: public policy or private penchant?

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Measures used in studies of informed decision making about cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia Dolan Mullen; Jennifer Dacey Allen; Karen Glanz; Maria E Fernandez; Deborah J Bowen; Sandi L Pruitt; Beth A Glenn; Michael Pignone
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-12

8.  Age identification: a comparison between Finnish and North-American cultures.

Authors:  V Uotinen
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1998

9.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Vilma Cokkinides; Gopal K Singh; Cheryll Cardinez; Asma Ghafoor; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lost in translation: student perceptions of cultural competence in undergraduate and graduate nursing curricula.

Authors:  Danica Fulbright Sumpter; J Margo Brooks Carthon
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Beliefs Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening Among Black Males Aged 18 to 40 Years.

Authors:  Motolani E Ogunsanya; Carolyn M Brown; Folakemi T Odedina; Jamie C Barner; Brittany Corbell; Taiwo B Adedipe
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-08

Review 3.  Men's perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Laura J James; Germaine Wong; Jonathan C Craig; Camilla S Hanson; Angela Ju; Kirsten Howard; Tim Usherwood; Howard Lau; Allison Tong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Knowledge of Prostate Cancer and Screening Among Young Multiethnic Black Men.

Authors:  Motolani E Ogunsanya; Carolyn M Brown; Folakemi T Odedina; Jamie C Barner; Taiwo B Adedipe; Brittany Corbell
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2017-01-31

5.  Choosing Channels, Sources, and Content for Communicating Prostate Cancer Information to Black Men: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kim Walsh-Childers; Folakemi Odedina; Alexandria Poitier; Ernest Kaninjing; Greenberry Taylor
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2018-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.