Literature DB >> 15779035

Optimization of the arterial input function for myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Andrew G Elkington1, Taigang He, Peter D Gatehouse, Sanjay K Prasad, David N Firmin, Dudley J Pennell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how injection rate, cardiac function, and breathhold influence the arterial input function (AIF), in order to optimize the AIF in the clinical setting for quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gd (0.1 mmol/kg) bolus was injected at 3, 5, or 7 mL/second in 35 patients. In each cardiac cycle during the first-pass, a series of saturation recovery (SR) fast low-angle shot (FLASH) low resolution images with exponentially increasing SR delay times were acquired. Signal intensity (SI) time measurements were made from a region of interest (ROI) drawn in the ascending aorta (AA). The calculation of short T1s and thus peak Gd concentration [Gd] was performed by fitting the mean ROI SI against SR delay times.
RESULTS: The mean peak [Gd] in the AA increased as injection rate increased from 3 mL/second (5.0 mM), to 5 mL/second (7.1 mM), to 7 mL/second (4 mM) (P < 0.0001). The peak [Gd] increased as the left ventricular stroke volume (LV SV) increased (P = 0.01). Breath holding was not found to influence peak [Gd].
CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that a high injection rate has advantages over lower injection speeds, although the duration of the AIF was apparently not significantly shortened by faster injection. The choice of expiration or inspiration as breathhold did not have a significant influence upon the AIF. Poor cardiac function was associated with a lower peak [Gd], indicating that first pass perfusion measurements in these patients will be suboptimal. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15779035     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance cardiac perfusion imaging-a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Thomas Schlosser; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  T2* measurement during first-pass contrast-enhanced cardiac perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Li-Yueh Hsu; Elliot R McVeigh; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Jacob U Fluckiger; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI at 3 tesla with accurate arterial input function and myocardial wall enhancement.

Authors:  Elodie Breton; Daniel Kim; Sohae Chung; Leon Axel
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Novel ultrasound and DCE-MRI analyses after antiangiogenic treatment with a selective VEGF receptor inhibitor.

Authors:  Katherine D Watson; Xiaowen Hu; Chun-Yen Lai; Heather A Lindfors; Dana D Hu-Lowe; Theresa A Tuthill; David R Shalinsky; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Cardiac MRI for myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Caroline Daly; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

7.  Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Michael S Hansen; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Jannike Nickander; Raquel Themudo; Martin Ugander; Hui Xue
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  SHILO, a novel dual imaging approach for simultaneous HI-/LOw temporal (Low-/Hi-spatial) resolution imaging for vascular dynamic contrast enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance: numerical simulations and feasibility in the carotid arteries.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Philip M Robson; Sarayu Ramachandran; Venkatesh Mani; Melanie Kotys-Traughber; Matthew Cham; Stefan E Fischer; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art.

Authors:  Bernhard L Gerber; Subha V Raman; Krishna Nayak; Frederick H Epstein; Pedro Ferreira; Leon Axel; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Regadenoson and adenosine are equivalent vasodilators and are superior than dipyridamole- a study of first pass quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Sujethra Vasu; W Patricia Bandettini; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Steve Leung; Christine Mancini; Sujata M Shanbhag; Joel Wilson; Oscar Julian Booker; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.