Literature DB >> 17238338

Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.

Eric L Eisenstein1, Maqui Ortiz, Kevin J Anstrom, David R Crosslin, David F Lobach.   

Abstract

Medical information systems are being recognized for their ability to improve patient outcomes. While standards for the economic evaluation of medical technologies were instituted in the mid-1990s, little is known about their application in medical information technology studies. In a review of medical information technology evaluation studies published between 1982 and 2002, we found that the volume and variety of economic evaluations had increased; however, investigators routinely omitted key cost or effectiveness elements in their designs, resulting in publications with incomplete, and potentially biased, economic findings. Of the studies that made economic claims, 23% did not report any economic data, 40% failed to include any effectiveness measures, and more than 50% used a case study or pre- post- test design. Thus, during a time when health economic study methods in general have experienced significant development, there is little evidence of similar progress in medical information technology economic evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17238338      PMCID: PMC1839531     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  6 in total

1.  Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? The testing of healthcareinterventions is evolving.

Authors:  B Haynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

2.  Will electronic order entry reduce health care costs?

Authors:  Christian M Birkmeyer; Joshua Lee; David W Bates; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

3.  An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.

Authors:  E Ammenwerth; N de Keizer
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.

Authors:  M F Drummond; T O Jefferson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-03

5.  A plea for controlled trials in medical informatics.

Authors:  W M Tierney; J M Overhage; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Report from the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.188

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Developing and testing a cost data collection instrument for noncommunicable disease registry planning.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence Tangka; Patrick Edwards; Sonja Hoover; Maggie Cole-Beebe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Ashly D Black; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Chantelle Anandan; Kathrin Cresswell; Tomislav Bokun; Brian McKinstry; Rob Procter; Azeem Majeed; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.069

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.