OBJECTIVE: To assess whether intrapartum acidosis affects specific components of fetal heart rate variability. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Twelve Nordic delivery units. SUBJECTS: Fetal heart rate variability was studied in 334 fetuses divided into two groups according to cord pH value: the acidotic group (cord arterial pH < 7.05 at birth, n= 15) and the control group (cord arterial pH > or =7.05 at birth, n= 319). METHODS: In spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability, frequencies were integrated over the total frequency band (0.04-1.0 Hz), low-frequency band (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency band (0.15-1.0 Hz). We also calculated the low-to-high frequency ratio. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The spectral bands of fetal heart rate variability were compared between the acidotic and control fetuses. RESULTS: We found that during the last hour of monitoring, baseline fetal heart rate gradually decreased, whereas total, low-frequency and high-frequency fetal heart rate variability initially increased but then, near the delivery, decreased in the acidotic fetuses when compared with the controls. Low-to-high frequency ratio was greater in the acidotic group during the whole study period (P= 0.002). Cord artery pH was inversely associated with total fetal heart rate variability (P < 0.001), low-frequency fetal heart rate variability (P < 0.001) and low-to-high frequency ratio (P= 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Marked fetal acidosis was associated with frequency-specific changes in fetal heart rate variability as reflecting the compensation ability of autonomic nervous activation during the last hour of labour.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether intrapartum acidosis affects specific components of fetal heart rate variability. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Twelve Nordic delivery units. SUBJECTS: Fetal heart rate variability was studied in 334 fetuses divided into two groups according to cord pH value: the acidotic group (cord arterial pH < 7.05 at birth, n= 15) and the control group (cord arterial pH > or =7.05 at birth, n= 319). METHODS: In spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability, frequencies were integrated over the total frequency band (0.04-1.0 Hz), low-frequency band (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency band (0.15-1.0 Hz). We also calculated the low-to-high frequency ratio. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The spectral bands of fetal heart rate variability were compared between the acidotic and control fetuses. RESULTS: We found that during the last hour of monitoring, baseline fetal heart rate gradually decreased, whereas total, low-frequency and high-frequency fetal heart rate variability initially increased but then, near the delivery, decreased in the acidotic fetuses when compared with the controls. Low-to-high frequency ratio was greater in the acidotic group during the whole study period (P= 0.002). Cord artery pH was inversely associated with total fetal heart rate variability (P < 0.001), low-frequency fetal heart rate variability (P < 0.001) and low-to-high frequency ratio (P= 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Marked fetal acidosis was associated with frequency-specific changes in fetal heart rate variability as reflecting the compensation ability of autonomic nervous activation during the last hour of labour.
Authors: Christopher A Lear; Robert Galinsky; Guido Wassink; Clinton J Mitchell; Joanne O Davidson; Jennifer A Westgate; Laura Bennet; Alistair J Gunn Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Madalena D Costa; William T Schnettler; Célia Amorim-Costa; João Bernardes; Antónia Costa; Ary L Goldberger; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Václav Chudáček; Jiří Spilka; Miroslav Burša; Petr Janků; Lukáš Hruban; Michal Huptych; Lenka Lhotská Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: C Garabedian; Y Clermont-Hama; D Sharma; E Aubry; L Butruille; P Deruelle; L Storme; J De Jonckheere; V Houfflin-Debarge Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maria Romano; Luigi Iuppariello; Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione; Giovanni Improta; Paolo Bifulco; Mario Cesarelli Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 2.238