Literature DB >> 15776576

Lymphoid cell dependence of eosinophil response to antigen.

M P McGarry, R S Speirs, V K Jenkins, J J Trentin.   

Abstract

Quantitative determinations were made of the capacity of isogenic bone marrow, spleen, and thymic cells from primed and/or nonprimed mice to repopulate the hemopoietic tissues and to mount an inflammatory and antibody response to specific antigen (tetanus toxoid) in heavily irradiated and reconstituted recipients. Spleen cells from primed mice but not from normal mice had the capacity to adoptively transfer an anamnestic antitoxin titer in irradiated animals in the absence of transplanted bone marrow cells, and during retarded myeloid regeneration. Spleen cells alone or bone marrow cells alone produced an insignificant and a moderate peritoneal eosinophil response, respectively, to antigen. In the presence of bone marrow cells, normal spleen cells augment the capacity of recipient animals to mount an eosinophil response to antigen. A much greater augmentation occurs in animals reconstituted with splenic or thymic cells from primed animals. The increase in antitoxin titers appears to be independent of the response of eosinophils since: (a) marked accumulation of eosinophils can occur in animals with no measurable humoral antitoxin, and (b) high antitoxin titers can occur in animals which do not have marked eosinophil responses. It is suggested that a thymic-derived or thymic-dependent mononuclear cell population is necessary for optimal eosinophil response to antigen. The neutrophil and mononuclear cell responses to antigen are determined by different mechanisms from those which determine the eosinophil response. These studies together with earlier findings strongly indicate that the eosinophil granulocytes play a role in the immune response to antigen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1971        PMID: 15776576      PMCID: PMC2139085          DOI: 10.1084/jem.134.3.801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  16 in total

Review 1.  CELLULAR RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN MATTER.

Authors:  S BOYDEN
Journal:  Int Rev Exp Pathol       Date:  1963

2.  Normal and pathologic anatomy of the reticular tissue in laboratory mice, with a classification and discussion of neoplasms.

Authors:  T B DUNN
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  The sensitivity of cells from normal mouse bone marrow to gamma radiation in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  E A McCulloch; J E Till
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Chemotaxis of human eosinophils.

Authors:  P A Ward
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Affinity of antigen for white cells and its relation to the induction of antibody formation.

Authors:  D Sulitzeanu
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1968-12

6.  Parathymic lymph nodes in rats and mice.

Authors:  J N Blau; J M Gaugas
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Formation of antigen-induced granulomas containing plasma cells: a light and electron microscopic study.

Authors:  T J Athanassiades; R S Speirs
Journal:  J Reticuloendothel Soc       Date:  1968-12

8.  Synergism of thymus and bone marrow in the production of gra a5hilgard HR: Synergism of thymus and bone marrow in the production of graft-versus-host splenomegaly in x-irradiated hosts.

Authors:  H R Hilgard
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Mechanism of eosinophilia. II. Role of the lymphocyte.

Authors:  A Basten; P B Beeson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1970-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Mechanism of eosinophilia. I. Factors affecting the eosinophil response of rats to Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  A Basten; M H Boyer; P B Beeson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1970-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  13 in total

1.  Eosinophilia. V. Delayed hypersensitivity, blood and bone marrow eosinophilia, induced in normal guinea-pigs by adoptive transfer of lymphocytes from syngeneic donors.

Authors:  W E Parish; E Luckhurst; S I Cowan
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Genetic control of eosinophilia. Analysis of production and response to eosinophil-differentiating factor in strains of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  D A Lammas; L A Mitchell; D Wakelin
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  A suggested role for colostral antibody in the eosinophil response of the piglet.

Authors:  J C Anderson
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1973-04

4.  Interleukin-5 is necessary for eosinophilia induced by cyclophosphamide in immunized mice.

Authors:  H H Mu; R Penny; W A Sewell
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Evidence for the control of eosinophilia by the major histocompatibility complex in mice.

Authors:  W A Sewell; M A Vadas
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.846

6.  Eosinophilia in athymic nude (rnu/rnu) rats--thymus-independent eosinophilia?

Authors:  D I Pritchard; R P Eady
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Antigen-mediated release of eosinophil growth stimulating factor from Trichinella spiralis sensitized spleen cells: a comparison of T. spiralis stage-specific antigen preparations.

Authors:  S H Bartelmez; W H Dodge; D A Bass
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  Eosinophil and neutrophil granulocyte exudation in the Chediak-Higashi (beige) mouse.

Authors:  M P McGarry; E J Brandt; R T Swank
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Lymphoid cell dependence of eosinophil response to antigen. VI. The effect of selective removal of T or B lymphocytes on the capacity of primed spleen cells to adoptively transferred immunity to tetanus toxoid.

Authors:  N M Ponzio; R S Speirs
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  The effect of eosinophil chemotactic factors on in vitro eosinopoiesis in the guinea pig.

Authors:  B M Czarnetzki; B Pawelzik
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1983-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.