Literature DB >> 1079015

Lymphoid cell dependence of eosinophil response to antigen. VI. The effect of selective removal of T or B lymphocytes on the capacity of primed spleen cells to adoptively transferred immunity to tetanus toxoid.

N M Ponzio, R S Speirs.   

Abstract

Spleens from mice primed with tetanus toxoid 30 days earlier contain memory cells capable of adoptively transferring secondary type cell-mediated (eosinophil) and humoral (antitoxin) responses to irradiated, reconstituted recipients. Spleen cells derived from 10-day-primed donors, on the other hand, possess the capacity after transfer to elicit secondary type eosinophil responses, but not anamnestic antitoxin responses. Treatment of 30-day-primed cells with anti-theta serum and C' prevented transfer of memory for both responses, whereas similar treatment with rabbit anti-mouse IgG (RAM-IgG) serum and C' only inhibited transfer of memory for the antitoxin response. Addition of non-primed spleen cells to antisera-treated primed cells failed to restore secondary type responses. Recombination of 30-day-primed anti-theta and RAM-IgG-treated cells re-established the capacity to transfer these responses. To determine whether the same T cells which mediate the eosiniphil response also act as helper cells in antitoxin production, antisera treated 10- and 30-day-primed cells were combined prior to transfer. Ten-day-primed T cells induced eisoniphil responses and also co-operated with 30-day-primed B cells to produce antitoxin. In contrast, 30-day-primed T cells elicited eisinophil responses, but were unable to induce antitoxin production when combined with anti-theta-treated 10-day-primed cells. These results indicate that B memory cells are not present in the spleens of the donor mice 10 days after priming, but T memory cells are present. It is concluded that primed T cells mediated both eosinophil and antitoxin responses, while B memory cells are involved only with antitoxin production. Following subcutaneous priming T memory cells are present in the spleen prior to B memory cells, and T memory cells which mediate the eosinophil response at 10 days after priming also augment the production of antitoxin by B memory cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1079015      PMCID: PMC1445803     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  29 in total

1.  Eosinophil response to toxoids in actively and passively immunized mice.

Authors:  R S SPEIRS; U WENCK
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1955-12

2.  Bio-assay of four tetanus toxoids (aluminum precipitated) in mice, guinea pigs and humans.

Authors:  J IPSEN
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1953-04       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Delayed hypersensitivity: is the same population of thymus-derived cells responsible for cellular immunity reactions and the carrier effect?

Authors:  J Kettman
Journal:  Immunol Commun       Date:  1972

4.  Cell-to-cell interaction in the immune response. VI. Contribution of thymus-derived cells and antibody-forming cell precursors to immunological memory.

Authors:  J F Miller; J Sprent
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-07-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Cell mediated immune reactions "in vitro". Reactivity of lymphocytes from animals sensitized to chicken erythrocytes, tuberculin or transplantation antigens.

Authors:  B Chapuis; K T Brunner
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol       Date:  1971

6.  Absorption of guinea pig serum with agar. A method for elimination of itscytotoxicity for murine thymus cells.

Authors:  A Cohen; M Schlesinger
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  [Method of preparation and analysis of purified anti-tetanus gamma globulins from hyperimmune bovine serum].

Authors:  S E Piazzi
Journal:  Prog Immunobiol Stand       Date:  1970

8.  Surface antigens of immunocompetent cells. I. Effect of theta and PC.1 alloantisera on the ability of spleen cells to transfer immune responses.

Authors:  T Takahashi; E A Carswell; G J Thorbecke
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1970-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Lymphoid cell dependence of eosinophil response to antigen.

Authors:  M P McGarry; R S Speirs; V K Jenkins; J J Trentin
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Mechanism of eosinophilia. I. Factors affecting the eosinophil response of rats to Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  A Basten; M H Boyer; P B Beeson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1970-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  4 in total

1.  Eosinophilia. V. Delayed hypersensitivity, blood and bone marrow eosinophilia, induced in normal guinea-pigs by adoptive transfer of lymphocytes from syngeneic donors.

Authors:  W E Parish; E Luckhurst; S I Cowan
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Eosinophil activation in ulcerative colitis: studies on mucosal release and localization of eosinophil granule constituents.

Authors:  Y Raab; K Fredens; B Gerdin; R Hällgren
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Tumor-associated eosinophilia in interleukin-2-treated patients: evidence of toxic eosinophil degranulation on bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Enhancement of human eosinophil-mediated killing of Schistosoma mansoni larvae by mononuclear cell products in vitro.

Authors:  M C Veith; A E Butterworth
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1983-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.