Literature DB >> 10948295

Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: long-term follow-up.

M E Franklin1, G B Kazantsev, D Abrego, J A Diaz-E, J Balli, J L Glass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of colorectal cancer is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the oncological adequacy, in terms of margins of resection, lymph node harvest, and anastomotic and locoregional recurrence of laparoscopic colectomy in patients with stage III (node-positive) colorectal cancer.
METHODS: The results of laparoscopic colectomy in 50 consecutive patients with stage III colorectal cancer operated on at a single hospital between 1991 and 1998 were analyzed with respect to postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival by the Kaplan-Meier method. Methodical patient follow-up was the mainstay of the study.
RESULTS: There were 31 men (52%) and 19 women (38%) with a mean age of 67.7 years (range, 40-88). Low anterior resection was performed in 17 cases, abdominal perineal resection in five cases sigmoid colectomy in 10 cases, left hemicolectomy in six cases, right hemicolectomy in seven cases, transverse colectomy in one case, and subtotal colectomy in four cases. Conversion was necessary in three cases (6%). Major complications included one leak, one pelvic abscess, one perineal wound infection, and three anastomotic strictures early in the experience, with none in the past 4 years. One early death occurred due to massive stroke. Median length of stay was 6 days (range, 3-37). Forty-six patients were staged as CII and four as CI colon cancer. The average number of positive nodes was 5.1 (range, 3-58). The margins of resection were adequate in all patients. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 75 months (average, 29.3; median, 24). Overall cancer-related mortality was 34% (17 patients); three patients died of unrelated causes with no detectable cancer. All who died of cancer had distant disease; three of them also had pelvic recurrence. Mean time of death was 21.7 months. There were no anastomotic recurrences or trocar site implants. Overall 3- and 5-year survival was 54.5% and 38.5%, respectively; cancer-adjusted survival was 60.8% and 49.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, laparoscopic colectomy in patients with stage III colorectal cancer is oncologically adequate. It results in a long-term outcome comparable to that of traditional open surgery and is associated with low perioperative mortality and morbidity (lower wound infection rate, lower wound recurrences at trocar sites) and a shortened length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10948295     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

1.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for 135 patients with small nonadvanced low rectal cancer (iT1-iT2, iN0): short- and long-term results.

Authors:  Giovanni Lezoche; Mario Guerrieri; Maddalena Baldarelli; Alessandro Maria Paganini; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Roberto Campagnacci; Silvia Bartolacci; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Should carcinoma of the colon be treated laparoscopically? Point.

Authors:  R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.

Authors:  Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy with transanal specimen extraction: a bridge to NOTES?

Authors:  J Knol; M D'Hondt; E J Dozois; J Vanden Boer; P Malisse
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applied totally to sigmoidectomy: an original technique with survival in a porcine model.

Authors:  Joel Leroy; Ronan A Cahill; Silvana Perretta; Antonello Forgione; Bernard Dallemagne; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Video. Transanal specimen retrieval using the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) system in minimally invasive colon resection.

Authors:  Konstantinos I Makris; Erwin Rieder; Andrew S Kastenmeier; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Y W Novitsky; D E M Litwin; M P Callery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Transanal natural orifice specimen extraction for laparoscopic anterior resection in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fang-Hai Han; Li-Xin Hua; Zhi Zhao; Jian-Hai Wu; Wen-Hua Zhan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy.

Authors:  Mario Guerrieri; Roberto Campagnacci; Angelo De Sanctis; Giovanni Lezoche; Paolo Massucco; Massimo Summa; Rosaria Gesuita; Lorenzo Capussotti; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.