Literature DB >> 15775755

Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organization: a naturally-occurring experiment.

Judy Mouchawar1, Sharon Hensley-Alford, Suzanne Laurion, Jennifer Ellis, Alanna Kulchak-Rahm, Melissa L Finucane, Richard Meenan, Lisen Axell, Rebecca Pollack, Debra Ritzwoller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the impact of Myriad Genetics, Inc.'s direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC-ad) campaign on cancer genetic services within two Managed Care Organizations, Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO), Denver, Colorado, where the ad campaign occurred, and Henry Ford Health System (HFHS), Detroit, Michigan, where there were no advertisements.
METHODS: The main outcome measures were the changes in number and pretest mutation probability of referrals approved for cancer genetic services at KPCO and HFHS during the campaign versus the year prior, and mutation probability of those undergoing testing.
RESULTS: At KPCO, referrals increased 244% during the DTC-ad compared to the same time period a year earlier (P value<0.001). The proportion of referrals at high pretest probability of a mutation (10% or greater) dropped from 69% the previous year to 48% during the campaign (P value<0.001). There was no significant change in pretest mutation probability among women who underwent testing between the two time periods. HFHS reported no significant change between the two time periods for numbers or mutation probability of referrals, or for mutation probability of women tested.
CONCLUSION: The DTC-ad caused significant increase in demand for cancer genetic services. In the face of potential future DTC-ad for inherited cancer risk, providers and payers need to consider the delivery of genetic services and genetic education for persons of all risk levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Myriad Genetics Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15775755     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000156526.16967.7a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  31 in total

1.  Effect of ambiguous hemochromatosis gene test results on physician utilization.

Authors:  Mark Speechley; David Alter; Helen Guo; Helen Harrison; Paul C Adams
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Increasing utilization of cancer genetic counseling services using a patient navigator model.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Anna Sukhanova; Jennifer Ellis; Judy Mouchawar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 4.  Cancer-related direct-to-consumer advertising: a critical review.

Authors:  Emily Z Kontos; K Viswanath
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  FDA Approval of PARP Inhibitors and the Impact on Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing Practices.

Authors:  Kathryn M Buchtel; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Shelly Weiss; Carmen Williams; Mario Pineda; Scott M Weissman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Associations between cancer-related information seeking and receiving PET imaging for routine cancer surveillance--an analysis of longitudinal survey data.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Laura Gibson; Hanna M Zafar; Stacy W Gray; Robert C Hornik; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  KRAS testing and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor treatment for colorectal cancer in community settings.

Authors:  Jennifer Webster; Tia L Kauffman; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Pamala A Pawloski; Adedayo A Onitilo; Arnold L Potosky; Deanna Cross; Paul R Meier; Anousheh S Mirabedi; Thomas Delate; Yihe Daida; Andrew E Williams; Gwen L Alexander; Catherine A McCarty; Stacey Honda; Lawrence H Kushi; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Selected aspects of genetic counselling for BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Jacek Gronwald
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.