Literature DB >> 15773720

Comparison of build-up dose between Elekta and Varian linear accelerators for high-energy photon beams using radiochromic film and clinical implications for IMRT head and neck treatments.

L Paelinck1, C De Wagter, A Van Esch, W Duthoy, T Depuydt, W De Neve.   

Abstract

Skin toxicity has been reported for IMRT of head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dose in the build-up region delivered by a 6 MV treatment plan for which important skin toxicity was observed. We also investigated if the different designs of the treatment head of an Elekta and a Varian linear accelerator, especially the lower position of the Varian multi-leaf collimator, give rise to different build-up doses. For regular square open beams, the build-up dose along the central beam axis is higher for the Varian machine than for the Elekta machine, both for 6 MV and 18 MV. At the Elekta machine at 18 MV, the superficial dose of a diamond shaped 10 x 10 cm2 field is 3.6% lower than the superficial dose of a regular 10 x 10 cm2 field. This effect is not seen at 6 MV. At the Varian machine, the superficial dose of the diamond shaped field is respectively 3.5 and 14.2% higher than the superficial dose of the regular 10 x 10 cm2 field for 6 MV and 18 MV. Despite the differences measured in build-up dose for single beams between the Elekta and the Varian linear accelerator, there were no measurable differences in superficial dose when a typical IMRT dose plan of 6 MV for a head and neck tumour is executed at the two machines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773720     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/3/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of 4 MV photon surface dose among Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linear accelerators for tangential breast treatment: a phantom study.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamaguchi; Kumiko Karasawa; Tomohisa Furuya; Takayuki Fujita; Yutaka Tutumi; Kohei Miura; Takahiro Takada; Kana Ito; Shuichi Ozawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

2.  Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  Surface and build-up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening-filter-free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water-equivalent phantom.

Authors:  Toshikazu Imae; Shigeharu Takenaka; Yuichi Watanabe; Atsushi Aoki; Kanako Matsuda; Katsutake Sasaki; Shigeki Saegusa; Kanabu Nawa; Keiichi Nakagawa; Osamu Abe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Estimation of Skin doses for Retrofit Prototype Multileaf Collimators Designed for Telecobalt Therapy Machine.

Authors:  Akula Roopa Rani; Komanduri Ayyangar; A R Reddy; Ayyalasomayajula Anil Kumar; Pal Reddy Yadagiri Reddy
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-02

5.  An investigation of the depth dose in the build-up region, and surface dose for a 6-MV therapeutic photon beam: Monte Carlo simulation and measurements.

Authors:  Lukkana Apipunyasopon; Somyot Srisatit; Nakorn Phaisangittisakul
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj; Girigesh Yadav; Ananda Giribabu; Karthikeyan Srinivasan; Venkadamanickam Gurusamy; Kothanda Raman; Kaviarasu Karunakaran; Rajesh Thiyagarajan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Comparing dose in the build-up region between compensator- and MLC-based IMRT.

Authors:  Khosrow Javedan; Geoffrey G Zhang; Sarah Hoffe; Vladimir Feygelman; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.