Literature DB >> 15770225

Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families.

Angus Clarke1, Martin Richards, Lauren Kerzin-Storrar, Jane Halliday, Mary Anne Young, Sheila A Simpson, Katie Featherstone, Karen Forrest, Anneke Lucassen, Patrick J Morrison, Oliver W J Quarrell, Helen Stewart.   

Abstract

Patients attending genetic clinics are often the main gatekeepers of information for other family members. There has been much debate about the circumstances under which professionals may have an obligation, or may be permitted, to pass on personal genetic information about their clients but without their consent to other family members. We report findings from the first prospective study investigating the frequency with which genetics professionals become concerned about the failure of clients to pass on such information to their relatives. In all, 12 UK and two Australian regional genetic services reported such cases over 12 months, including details of actions taken by professionals in response to the clients' failure to disclose information. A total of 65 cases of non-disclosure were reported, representing <1% of the genetic clinic consultations in the collaborating centres during the study period. These included 39 cases of the failure of parents not passing full information to their adult offspring, 22 cases where siblings or other relatives were not given information and four cases where information was withheld from partners -- including former and prospective partners. Professionals reported clients' reasons for withholding information as complex, more often citing concern and the desire to shield relatives from distress rather than poor family relationships. In most cases, the professionals took further steps to persuade their clients to make a disclosure but in no instance did the professional force a disclosure without the client's consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15770225     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  38 in total

Review 1.  How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa; Angus Clarke; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Disclosing the disclosure: factors associated with communicating the results of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

4.  Compare and contrast: a cross-national study across UK, USA and Greek experts regarding return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.

Authors:  Elli G Gourna; Natalie Armstrong; Susan E Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Enhancing family communication about genetics: ethical and professional dilemmas.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Clara Gaff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Disclosure to genetic relatives without consent - Australian genetic professionals' awareness of the health privacy law.

Authors:  Natalia Meggiolaro; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Kate Dunlop; Ainsley J Newson; Jane Fleming
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS).

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A DeMarco; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Marc D Schwartz; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-04-01

9.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.