Literature DB >> 15767643

Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism associated with central vein catheter: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study in cancer patients.

Melina Verso1, Giancarlo Agnelli, Sergio Bertoglio, Franco C Di Somma, Francesco Paoletti, Walter Ageno, Mario Bazzan, Pasquale Parise, Roberto Quintavalla, Emanuele Naglieri, Armando Santoro, Davide Imberti, Mariella Sorarù, Stefano Mosca.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The extent of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with central vein catheters (CVC) in cancer patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, in the prevention of VTE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind study, consecutive cancer patients scheduled for CVC insertion were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once a day or placebo. Treatment was started 2 hours before CVC insertion and continued for 6 weeks. The primary end points of the study were deep vein thrombosis (DVT), confirmed by venography of the CVC limb performed 6 weeks after randomization, or clinically overt pulmonary embolism, confirmed by objective testing during the study drug administration. Patients were assessed for bleeding complications.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-five patients were randomized, of which 321 (83.4%) underwent venography. A venography was adequate for adjudication in 155 patients in each treatment group. A DVT was observed in 22 patients (14.1%) treated with enoxaparin and in 28 patients (18.0%) treated with placebo, corresponding to a relative risk of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.31). No major bleeding occurred. Five patients (2.6%) in the enoxaparin group and two patients (1.0%) in the placebo group died during the treatment period.
CONCLUSION: In this study, no difference in the rate of CVC-related VTE was detected between patients receiving enoxaparin and patients receiving placebo. The dose of enoxaparin used in this study proved to be safe. Clinical trials evaluating higher enoxaparin doses could optimize the efficacy of this agent for this indication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15767643     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  71 in total

1.  Port catheter versus peripherally inserted central catheter for postoperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 448 patients.

Authors:  L Lefebvre; E Noyon; D Georgescu; V Proust; C Alexandru; M Leheurteur; J C Thery; L Savary; O Rigal; F Di Fiore; C Veyret; F Clatot
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Alessandro Squizzato
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Patterns of use of vascular access devices in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Juan J Toro; Manuel Morales; Fausto Loberiza; Jose L Ochoa-Bayona; Cesar O Freytes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Davide Tassinari; Carlotta Santelmo; Paola Tombesi; Sergio Sartori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Is catheter-related thrombosis after cardiac surgery clinically relevant?

Authors:  Alessandro Squizzato; Elisa Manfredi; Bregje van Zaane; Victor E Gerdes
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.

Authors:  G S Patel; K Jain; R Kumar; A H Strickland; L Pellegrini; J Slavotinek; M Eaton; W McLeay; T Price; M Ly; S Ullah; B Koczwara; G Kichenadasse; C S Karapetis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 1: prophylaxis.

Authors:  J C Easaw; M A Shea-Budgell; C M J Wu; P M Czaykowski; J Kassis; B Kuehl; H J Lim; M MacNeil; D Martinusen; P A McFarlane; E Meek; O Moodley; S Shivakumar; V Tagalakis; S Welch; P Kavan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies.

Authors:  W Saber; T Moua; E C Williams; M Verso; G Agnelli; S Couban; A Young; M De Cicco; R Biffi; C J van Rooden; M V Huisman; D Fagnani; C Cimminiello; M Moia; M Magagnoli; S P Povoski; S F Malak; A Y Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 9.  Thrombosis in cancer patients: etiology, incidence, and management.

Authors:  Rahul A Sheth; Andrew Niekamp; Keith B Quencer; Fadi Shamoun; Martha-Gracia Knuttinen; Sailendra Naidu; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

10.  Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in breast cancer patients treated with infusional chemotherapy after insertion of central vein catheter.

Authors:  Giuseppe Curigliano; Alessandra Balduzzi; Anna Cardillo; Raffaella Ghisini; Giulia Peruzzotti; Laura Orlando; Rosalba Torrisi; Silvia Dellapasqua; Loredana Lunghi; Aron Goldhirsch; Marco Colleoni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.