Literature DB >> 17486374

Patterns of use of vascular access devices in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: results of an international survey.

Juan J Toro1, Manuel Morales, Fausto Loberiza, Jose L Ochoa-Bayona, Cesar O Freytes.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is limited information regarding of use of vascular access devices (VAD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The frequent use of VAD in HSCT and its potential to cause morbidity requires understanding of the general use of VAD in HSCT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A World Wide Web-based 19-item questionnaire was designed to determine the patterns of use of VAD in patients undergoing HSCT. The questionnaire was sent via electronic mail to the directors of HSCT programs throughout the world.
RESULTS: Of the 445 centers surveyed, 163 centers replied for a response rate of 37%. The most commonly used catheter for autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest is the dual-lumen plasmapheresis/hemodialysis (62%). Of the institutions, 58% utilize the same catheter used for PBSC harvest to provide vascular access support during the transplant. Catheter-related blood stream infection (36%) and withdrawal occlusion (31%) were the most frequently encountered complications of VAD. Of the centers, 65% have established criteria for VAD removal when infection is suspected and 48% when occlusion is suspected. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated that there are similarities in the utilization of VAD but also wide differences in the standard procedures for the insertion and care of VAD in the transplant setting. More comprehensive studies are needed to assess the use of central venous catheters in transplant recipients. Important areas for future research include the impact of VAD utilization on the quality of life of transplant recipients and the final consequences of VAD complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17486374     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0261-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  15 in total

Review 1.  Catheter-related thrombosis: risks, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Michael L Linenberger
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Prevalence of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis diagnosed by color Doppler duplex sonography in cancer patients with central venous catheters.

Authors:  Diana Gaitini; Nira Beck-Razi; Nissim Haim; Benjamin Brenner
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism associated with central vein catheter: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study in cancer patients.

Authors:  Melina Verso; Giancarlo Agnelli; Sergio Bertoglio; Franco C Di Somma; Francesco Paoletti; Walter Ageno; Mario Bazzan; Pasquale Parise; Roberto Quintavalla; Emanuele Naglieri; Armando Santoro; Davide Imberti; Mariella Sorarù; Stefano Mosca
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Randomized placebo-controlled study of low-dose warfarin for the prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Stephen Couban; Michael Goodyear; Margot Burnell; Sean Dolan; Parveen Wasi; David Barnes; Darlene Macleod; Erica Burton; Pantelis Andreou; David R Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided technique for central venous access via the internal jugular vein in 493 patients.

Authors:  U Mey; A Glasmacher; C Hahn; M Gorschlüter; C Ziske; M Mergelsberg; T Sauerbruch; I G H Schmidt-Wolf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Performance of a hybrid central venous catheter utilized for both peripheral blood stem cell harvest and transplant support of patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  A Restrepo; P Devore; C E Encarnación; M H Wholey; D Schneider; N S Callander; H Ferral; D Postoak; J E Anderson; T Walsh; G Padayao; E Gokmen; A Ehsan; L Ochoa; B Neumon; G West; M I Restrepo; J Przykucki; J Patterson; C O Freytes
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 7.  Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients.

Authors:  Melina Verso; Giancarlo Agnelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Percutaneous insertion of Hickman catheters while the patient is in bed: a simplification of the technique.

Authors:  M Morales; J Dorta
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Techniques and controversies.

Authors:  J H Raaf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Patient education and compliance issues associated with access devices.

Authors:  M K McDermott
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.