Literature DB >> 15766814

Gender and myocardial salvage after reperfusion treatment in acute myocardial infarction.

Julinda Mehilli1, Gjin Ndrepepa, Adnan Kastrati, Stephan G Nekolla, Christina Markwardt, Hildegard Bollwein, Jürgen Pache, Stefan Martinoff, Josef Dirschinger, Markus Schwaiger, Albert Schömig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are gender-associated differences in the amount of myocardial salvage after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
BACKGROUND: Despite having a more adverse cardiovascular risk profile, women with AMI have similar or even better outcomes after primary PCI compared with men. The reasons for these findings are unclear.
METHODS: In this study we included 202 women and 561 men with AMI who underwent primary PCI in the setting of three randomized trials. The primary end point of the study was myocardial salvage index (proportion of initial perfusion defect salvaged by reperfusion therapy), obtained by paired scintigraphic studies performed 7 to 10 days apart.
RESULTS: The amount of myocardium at risk or initial perfusion defect (median [25th, 75th percentiles]) did not differ significantly between women and men (22.0% [12.0, 40.0] vs. 24.0% [14.0, 39.0] of the left ventricle [LV], p = 0.26). Final infarct size, measured in the follow-up scintigraphy, was significantly smaller in women than in men (6.0% [0.71, 18.7] vs. 10.0% [3.9, 21.8] of the LV, p = 0.001). Myocardial salvage index was 0.64 (0.35, 0.95) in women versus 0.50 (0.26, 0.77) in men (p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, female gender was an independent predictor of greater myocardial salvage after PCI (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of primary PCI in patients with AMI appears to be gender-dependent. Myocardial salvage achieved by primary PCI is greater in women than in men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15766814     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

1.  Gender differences in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Birgit Langhans; Tareq Ibrahim; Jörg Hausleiter; Carolin Sonne; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig; Martin Hadamitzky
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Novel modulators of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Authors:  Csaba Szabo; Pal Pacher; Raymond A Swanson
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  Evaluation of the influence of age and gender on the relationships between infarct size, infarct severity, and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients successfully treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Guido Parodi; Angela Migliorini; Gentian Memisha; David Antoniucci; Alberto Pupi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Gender differences in cardiovascular therapy: focus on antithrombotic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Julinda Mehilli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Sex-related resistance to myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury is associated with high constitutive ARC expression.

Authors:  Wobbe Bouma; Mio Noma; Shinya Kanemoto; Muneaki Matsubara; Bradley G Leshnower; Robin Hinmon; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Female stem cells are superior to males in preserving myocardial function following endotoxemia.

Authors:  Mariuxi C Manukyan; Brent R Weil; Yue Wang; Aaron M Abarbanell; Jeremy L Herrmann; Jeffrey A Poynter; Benjamin D Brewster; Daniel R Meldrum
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Amir Lerman; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Gender differences in the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-12

Review 9.  Ageing, sex, and cardioprotection.

Authors:  Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Kerstin Boengler; David Garcia-Dorado; Derek J Hausenloy; Tuuli Kaambre; Georgios Kararigas; Cinzia Perrino; Rainer Schulz; Kirsti Ytrehus
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Gender differences in management and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results on 20,290 patients from the AMIS Plus Registry.

Authors:  Dragana Radovanovic; Paul Erne; Philip Urban; Osmund Bertel; Hans Rickli; Jean-Michel Gaspoz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.