Literature DB >> 23053858

Gender differences in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after acute myocardial infarction.

Birgit Langhans1, Tareq Ibrahim, Jörg Hausleiter, Carolin Sonne, Stefan Martinoff, Albert Schömig, Martin Hadamitzky.   

Abstract

Besides different risk profiles for cardiovascular events in men and women, several studies reported gender differences in mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As infarct size has been shown to correlate with mortality, it is widely accepted as surrogate marker for clinical outcome. Currently, cardiovascular imaging studies covering the issue of gender differences are rare. As magnetic resonance scar characterization parameters are emerging as additional prognostic factors after acute myocardial infarction, we sought to evaluate gender differences in CMR infarct characteristics in patients after acute myocardial infarction. We prospectively analyzed patients (n = 448) with AMI and primary angioplasty, who underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging on a 1.5 T scanner in median 5 [4, 6] days after the acute event. [corrected]. CMR scar size was measured 15 min after gadolinium injection. In addition presence and extent of microvascular obstruction (MVO) was assessed. A matched pair analysis was performed in order to exclude confounding by gender related co-morbidities and gender differences in established clinical risk factors. Matching process according to clinical risk defined by GRACE score resulted in 93 mixed gender couples. Women were significantly older than men (64.4 ± 11.9 vs. 60.5 ± 12.3, p = 0.03) and presented with a significantly better ejection fraction before angioplasty (48.9 ± 8.4 vs. 46.2 ± 8.9, p = 0.04). Infarct size did not differ significantly between women and men (13.5 ± 10.7 vs. 15.1 ± 11.8, p = 0.32). Size of MVO was significantly smaller in women than in men (0.48 ± 1.3 vs. 1.2 ± 3.0, p = 0.03). Comparing scar characterization between women and men with similar risk profiles revealed no gender differences in scar size. Size of MVO, however, was significantly smaller in women and might reflect better cardioprotective mechanisms in women. Whether these changes have prognostic implications has to be tested on a larger patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053858     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0132-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  44 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tareq Ibrahim; Hubertus P Bülow; Thomas Hackl; Mira Hörnke; Stephan G Nekolla; Martin Breuer; Albert Schömig; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Cardiovascular disease in women--often silent and fatal.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Impact of early vs. late microvascular obstruction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging on long-term outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with traditional prognostic markers.

Authors:  Suzanne de Waha; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Georg Fuernau; Johannes Zachrau; Anja Leuschner; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Strategies of patient care in acute coronary syndromes: rationale for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) registry.

Authors:  C B Granger
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-12-28       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Gender-related differences in basal and hypoxia-induced activation of signal transduction pathways controlling cell cycle progression and apoptosis, in cardiac fibroblasts.

Authors:  Xiaojian Zhao; Mahboubeh Eghbali-Webb
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Sex differences in myocardial salvage and clinical outcome in patients with acute reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction: advances in cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Ingo Eitel; Steffen Desch; Suzanne de Waha; Georg Fuernau; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Sex-based analysis of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Julinda Mehilli; Adnan Kastrati; Josef Dirschinger; Jürgen Pache; Melchior Seyfarth; Rudolf Blasini; Donald Hall; Franz-Josef Neumann; Albert Schömig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction).

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Daniel T Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R Bates; Lee A Green; Mary Hand; Judith S Hochman; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Gervasio A Lamas; Charles J Mullany; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Michael A Sloan; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J Gibbons; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Sex related differences in short and long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction: 10 year follow up of 3073 patients in database of first Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial.

Authors:  S Galatius-Jensen; J Launbjerg; L S Mortensen; J F Hansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-20

10.  The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog.

Authors:  R A Kloner; C E Ganote; R B Jennings
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Gender but not diabetes, hypertension or smoking affects infarct evolution in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients - data from the CHILL-MI, MITOCARE and SOCCER trials.

Authors:  David Nordlund; Henrik Engblom; Jean-Louis Bonnet; Henrik Steen Hansen; Dan Atar; David Erlinge; Ulf Ekelund; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Left ventricular remodelling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: sex differences and prognosis.

Authors:  Pieter van der Bijl; Rachid Abou; Laurien Goedemans; Bernard J Gersh; David R Holmes; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-02-14

4.  Does sex influence the incidence or severity of reperfusion-induced cardiac arrhythmias?

Authors:  Joan S Dow; Anil Bhandari; Sharon L Hale; Robert A Kloner
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 5.  Cardiovascular disease in women: insights from magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Ellen Ostenfeld; Lauren A Baldassarre; Vanessa M Ferreira; Luba Frank; Kimberly Kallianos; Subha V Raman; Monvadi B Srichai; Elisa McAlindon; Sophie Mavrogeni; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Anne Marie Valente; Karen G Ordovas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.