Literature DB >> 15761955

Saturation labeling with cysteine-reactive cyanine fluorescent dyes provides increased sensitivity for protein expression profiling of laser-microdissected clinical specimens.

Olga Greengauz-Roberts1, Hubert Stöppler, Sachiyo Nomura, Hirokazu Yamaguchi, James R Goldenring, Robert H Podolsky, Jeffrey R Lee, William S Dynan.   

Abstract

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) provides the capability to isolate and analyze small numbers of cells from a specific area of a histologic section. LCM has particular value for analysis of early stage tumors, which are often small and intermixed with non-tumor tissue. It has previously been shown that a new generation of cysteine-reactive cyanine dyes can, in principle, provide increased sensitivity for two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) profiling when sample quantitities are limiting. However, the comparative advantage of the new dyes in a clinical setting has not been established. Here, we report that cysteine-reactive dyes allowed the identification of more features than established, lysine-reactive dyes with a given number of cells. This was true both with extracts prepared from human papillomavirus E6 and E7-transduced human keratinocytes, a model for early-stage cervical cancer, and with LCM samples. In an experiment comparing LCM clinical samples of gastric adenocarcinoma versus precancerous, spasmolytic polypeptide expressing metaplasia (SPEM) from the same patient, cysteine labeling allowed the identification of more than 1000 discrete protein spots in samples containing 5000 cells. This is a 5- to 50-fold smaller sample than used in previous studies. Both labeling methods had a comparable success rate for protein identification by mass spectrometry (MS). The proteins associated with more than 40 differentially abundant spots in the clinical samples were identified by MS. In this exploratory analysis, changes in expression levels of cytoskeletal proteins, molecular chaperones, and cell-signaling proteins were seen. The identification of a number of proteins that are potentially relevant to tumor progression suggests that the method holds promise for biomarker discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15761955     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  15 in total

1.  Protein analysis through Western blot of cells excised individually from human brain and muscle tissue.

Authors:  A O Koob; L Bruns; C Prassler; E Masliah; T Klopstock; A Bender
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 2.  Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis for biomaterial applications.

Authors:  Laura E McNamara; Matthew J Dalby; Mathis O Riehle; Richard Burchmore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  [Quantitative and comparative proteomics analysis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and adjacent noncancerous tissues by 2-D DIGE].

Authors:  Zhuang-Fei Chen; Yao-Jun Xiao; Ze-Hai Huang; Tong Chen; Shan-Chao Zhao; Yao-Dong Jiang; Peng Wu; Shao-Bin Zheng
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-11-20

4.  Zyxin modulates the transmigration of Haemophilus influenzae to the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yuko Miyazaki; Takashi Yusa; Saburo Matsuo; Yasuo Terauchi; Shuichi Miyazaki
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 5.  Beyond laser microdissection technology: follow the yellow brick road for cancer research.

Authors:  Luc G Legres; Anne Janin; Christophe Masselon; Philippe Bertheau
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  A quantitative proteomic workflow for characterization of frozen clinical biopsies: laser capture microdissection coupled with label-free mass spectrometry.

Authors:  John P Shapiro; Sabyasachi Biswas; Anand S Merchant; Anjali Satoskar; Cenny Taslim; Shili Lin; Brad H Rovin; Chandan K Sen; Sashwati Roy; Michael A Freitas
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Characterization of Molecular Markers Indicative of Cervical Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Hilal Arnouk; Mark A Merkley; Robert H Podolsky; Hubert Stöppler; Carlos Santos; Manuel Alvarez; Julio Mariategui; Daron Ferris; Jeffrey R Lee; William S Dynan
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Use of combination proteomic analysis to demonstrate molecular similarity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma arising from different subsites.

Authors:  Paul M Weinberger; Mark Merkley; Jeffrey R Lee; Bao-Ling Adam; Christine G Gourin; Robert H Podolsky; Bruce G Haffty; Evangelia Papadavid; Clarence Sasaki; Amanda Psyrri; William S Dynan
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-07

Review 9.  Microproteomics: analysis of protein diversity in small samples.

Authors:  Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris; Suresh P Annangudi; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  Measurement of protein sulfhydryls in response to cellular oxidative stress using gel electrophoresis and multiplexed fluorescent imaging analysis.

Authors:  Page C Spiess; Dexter Morin; William T Jewell; Alan R Buckpitt
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.