Literature DB >> 15761699

Discussing life expectancy with terminally ill cancer patients and their carers: a qualitative study.

Josephine M Clayton1, Phyllis N Butow, Robert M Arnold, Martin H N Tattersall.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: There is uncertainty regarding the preferred content and phrasing of information when discussing life expectancy with terminally ill cancer patients and their carers. The objective of this study was to explore the various stakeholders' perceptions about these issues. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted focus groups and individual interviews with 19 patients with advanced cancer and 24 carers from three different palliative care (PC) services in Sydney and 22 PC health professionals (HPs) from ten different sites in Australia. The focus groups and individual interviews were audiotaped and fully transcribed. Further focus groups and/or individual interviews were conducted until no additional topics were raised. Participants' narratives were analysed using qualitative methodology. MAIN
RESULTS: Participants' suggestions regarding the content of prognostic discussions included: explaining uncertainty and limitations, explaining the process involved with making survival predictions, and avoiding being too exact. Those patients and carers who wanted to be given a time frame mostly wanted to know how long the average person with their condition would live and/or be given a rough range. HPs had various views regarding ways to phrase life expectancy: days versus weeks versus months, likelihood of the patients being alive for certain events, a rough quantitative range and probabilities (e.g. 10% and 50% survival). However, most HPs said they would rarely if ever give statistical information to patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides some potential strategies, words and phrases which may inform discussions about life expectancy. Further research is needed to determine the generalizability of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15761699     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0789-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  21 in total

1.  Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  A M The; T Hak; G Koëter; G van Der Wal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

2.  Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life.

Authors:  E B Lamont; N A Christakis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A new palliative prognostic score: a first step for the staging of terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter and Study Group on Palliative Care.

Authors:  M Pirovano; M Maltoni; O Nanni; M Marinari; M Indelli; G Zaninetta; V Petrella; S Barni; E Zecca; E Scarpi; R Labianca; D Amadori; G Luporini
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Information needs in terminal illness.

Authors:  J S Kutner; J F Steiner; K K Corbett; D W Jahnigen; P L Barton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Perspectives on care at the close of life. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: addressing the "elephant in the room".

Authors:  T E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Misunderstanding in cancer patients: why shoot the messenger?

Authors:  M Gattellari; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; S M Dunn; C A MacLeod
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Complexities in prognostication in advanced cancer: "to help them live their lives the way they want to".

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Paul Glare; Kiran Virik; Mark Jones; Malcolm Hudson; Steffen Eychmuller; John Simes; Nicholas Christakis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-26

9.  'Hitting you over the head': oncologists' disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Elisa J Gordon; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 10.  Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners.

Authors:  A Girgis; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  19 in total

1.  Goals-of-Care Conversations for Older Adults With Serious Illness in the Emergency Department: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Kei Ouchi; Naomi George; Jeremiah D Schuur; Emily L Aaronson; Charlotta Lindvall; Edward Bernstein; Rebecca L Sudore; Mara A Schonberg; Susan D Block; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Unpacking cancer patients' preferences for information about their care.

Authors:  Erin M Ellis; Ashley Varner
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21

3.  Adding a Wider Range and "Hope for the Best, and Prepare for the Worst" Statement: Preferences of Patients with Cancer for Prognostic Communication.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Maiko Fujimori; Hiroto Ishiki; Tomohiro Nishi; Jun Hamano; Hiroyuki Otani; Yu Uneno; Akira Oba; Tatsuya Morita; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-02-19

4.  Physicians' perceptions of the value of prognostic models: the benefits and risks of prognostic confidence.

Authors:  Sarah A M Hallen; Norbert A M Hootsmans; Laura Blaisdell; Caitlin M Gutheil; Paul K J Han
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Communication about cancer near the end of life.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Wendy G Anderson; Lynn Bunch; Lisa A Marr; James A Wallace; Holly B Yang; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Patient-centered communication and prognosis discussions with cancer patients.

Authors:  Cleveland G Shields; Casey J Coker; Shruti S Poulsen; Jennifer M Doyle; Kevin Fiscella; Ronald M Epstein; Jennifer J Griggs
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-09

7.  Intensivist-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing Post-Discharge Outcomes with Intensive Care Unit Surrogates. A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Wesley E Davis; Dale M Needham; Douglas B White; Michelle N Eakin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-09

8.  Deciding what information is necessary: do patients with advanced cancer want to know all the details?

Authors:  Bethany J Russell; Alicia M Ward
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 9.  Integrated Model for Patient-Centered Advanced Liver Disease Care.

Authors:  Aanand D Naik; Jennifer Arney; Jack A Clark; Lindsey A Martin; Anne M Walling; Autumn Stevenson; Donna Smith; Steven M Asch; Fasiha Kanwal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 13.576

10.  Patient Preferences for Discussing Life Expectancy: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emma Bjørk; Wade Thompson; Jesper Ryg; Ove Gaardboe; Trine Lembrecht Jørgensen; Carina Lundby
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 6.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.