Literature DB >> 15760839

Comprehensive measurement of chromosomal instability in cancer cells: combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization and cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.

Jordi Camps1, Immaculada Ponsa, Maria Ribas, Esther Prat, Josep Egozcue, Miguel A Peinado, Rosa Miró.   

Abstract

Most tumors show abnormal karyotypes involving either chromosome rearrangements and/or aneuploidies. The aim of our study is to measure the rate of both structural and numerical chromosome instability in two colorectal cancer cell lines: HCT116, and SW480 and its single subclones. To determine structural instability, we measured the nonclonal chromosome alterations of the last cell division by means of multicolor-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). To quantify numerical instability, we used centromere-specific DNA probes to simultaneously detect chromosome loss and nondisjunctional events in binucleated cells obtained by cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay (CBMN). After clonal episodes, the structural chromosome instability rate increased significantly, confirming the large contribution of structural rearrangements to the heterogeneity of cancer cells. On the other hand, the aneuploidy rate was high and conserved in both the parental SW480 cell line and its subclones. The ability to differentiate chromosome loss and nondisjunction by the CBMN assay allowed us to conclude that no significant differences were detected among these events. Analysis of nucleoplasmic bridges, micronuclei, and nuclear blebs also demonstrated the differences among the structural instability rates of the parental cell line and its subclones. Overall, our results demonstrate the prevalence of structural over numerical chromosome instability in the subclones when comparing them with their parental cell line, confirming the contribution of ongoing chromosomal reorganizations in the generation of tumor cell heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15760839     DOI: 10.1096/fj.04-2276fje

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

Review 1.  Patterns of Chromosomal Aberrations in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Marian Grade; Michael J Difilippantonio; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2015

2.  Does aneuploidy destabilize karyotypes automatically?

Authors:  Peter H Duesberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of single cell-derived colorectal cancer cell lines is dominated by the continued selection of tumor-specific genomic imbalances, despite random chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Darawalee Wangsa; Rüdiger Braun; Madison Schiefer; Edward Michael Gertz; Daniel Bronder; Isabel Quintanilla; Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Irianna Torres; Cynthia Hunn; Lidia Warner; Floryne O Buishand; Yue Hu; Daniela Hirsch; Timo Gaiser; Jordi Camps; Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Near-tetraploid cancer cells show chromosome instability triggered by replication stress and exhibit enhanced invasiveness.

Authors:  Darawalee Wangsa; Isabel Quintanilla; Keyvan Torabi; Maria Vila-Casadesús; Amaia Ercilla; Gregory Klus; Zeynep Yuce; Claudia Galofré; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Juan José Lozano; Neus Agell; Daniela Cimini; Antoni Castells; Thomas Ried; Jordi Camps
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Targeting karyotypic complexity and chromosomal instability of cancer cells.

Authors:  Anna V Roschke; Ilan R Kirsch
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.465

6.  Cancer quasispecies and stem-like adaptive aneuploidy.

Authors:  Domenico Napoletani; Michele Signore; Daniele C Struppa
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-12-06

7.  Centrosome reduction in newly-generated tetraploid cancer cells obtained by separase depletion.

Authors:  Claudia Galofré; Elena Asensio; Maria Ubach; Irianna M Torres; Isabel Quintanilla; Antoni Castells; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  CKAP2 ensures chromosomal stability by maintaining the integrity of microtubule nucleation sites.

Authors:  Chanelle M Case; Dan L Sackett; Danny Wangsa; Tatiana Karpova; James G McNally; Thomas Ried; Jordi Camps
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tumor environmental factors glucose deprivation and lactic acidosis induce mitotic chromosomal instability--an implication in aneuploid human tumors.

Authors:  Chunyan Dai; Feifei Sun; Chunpeng Zhu; Xun Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantitative analysis of somatically acquired and constitutive uniparental disomy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Keyvan Torabi; Pau Erola; Maria Isabel Alvarez-Mora; Marcos Díaz-Gay; Queralt Ferrer; Antoni Castells; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Montserrat Milà; Juan José Lozano; Rosa Miró; Thomas Ried; Immaculada Ponsa; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 7.396

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.