Literature DB >> 29800151

The evolution of single cell-derived colorectal cancer cell lines is dominated by the continued selection of tumor-specific genomic imbalances, despite random chromosomal instability.

Darawalee Wangsa1, Rüdiger Braun1, Madison Schiefer1, Edward Michael Gertz2, Daniel Bronder1, Isabel Quintanilla3, Hesed M Padilla-Nash1, Irianna Torres1, Cynthia Hunn1, Lidia Warner1, Floryne O Buishand1,4, Yue Hu1, Daniela Hirsch5, Timo Gaiser5, Jordi Camps1,3, Russell Schwartz6, Alejandro A Schäffer2, Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad1, Thomas Ried1.   

Abstract

Intratumor heterogeneity is a major challenge in cancer treatment. To decipher patterns of chromosomal heterogeneity, we analyzed six colorectal cancer cell lines by multiplex interphase FISH (miFISH). The mismatch-repair-deficient cell lines DLD-1 and HCT116 had the most stable copy numbers, whereas aneuploid cell lines (HT-29, SW480, SW620 and H508) displayed a higher degree of instability. We subsequently assessed the clonal evolution of single cells in two colorectal carcinoma cell lines, SW480 and HT-29, which both have aneuploid karyotypes but different degrees of chromosomal instability. The clonal compositions of the single cell-derived daughter lines, as assessed by miFISH, differed for HT-29 and SW480. Daughters of HT-29 were stable, clonal, with little heterogeneity. Daughters of SW480 were more heterogeneous, with the single cell-derived daughter lines separating into two distinct populations with different ploidy (hyper-diploid and near-triploid), morphology, gene expression and tumorigenicity. To better understand the evolutionary trajectory for the two SW480 populations, we constructed phylogenetic trees which showed ongoing instability in the daughter lines. When analyzing the evolutionary development over time, most single cell-derived daughter lines maintained their major clonal pattern, with the exception of one daughter line that showed a switch involving a loss of APC. Our meticulous analysis of the clonal evolution and composition of these colorectal cancer models shows that all chromosomes are subject to segregation errors, however, specific net genomic imbalances are maintained. Karyotype evolution is driven by the necessity to arrive at and maintain a specific plateau of chromosomal copy numbers as the drivers of carcinogenesis. Published by Oxford University Press 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800151      PMCID: PMC6067130          DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgy068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  34 in total

1.  Biological heterogeneity and radiation sensitivity of in vitro propagated lung metastatic lines originated from a transplantable squamous cell carcinoma of BALB/c mouse.

Authors:  R J Jamasbi; E H Perkins
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1990-03

Review 2.  The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen.

Authors:  Robert H Shoemaker
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Human cancer cell lines: fact and fantasy.

Authors:  J R Masters
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Comparative genomic hybridization reveals a specific pattern of chromosomal gains and losses during the genesis of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  T Ried; R Knutzen; R Steinbeck; H Blegen; E Schröck; K Heselmeyer; S du Manoir; G Auer
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer?

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Vanessa Almendro; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Dynamics of genomic clones in breast cancer patient xenografts at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Peter Eirew; Adi Steif; Jaswinder Khattra; Gavin Ha; Damian Yap; Hossein Farahani; Karen Gelmon; Stephen Chia; Colin Mar; Adrian Wan; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Karey Shumansky; Jamie Rosner; Andrew McPherson; Cydney Nielsen; Andrew J L Roth; Calvin Lefebvre; Ali Bashashati; Camila de Souza; Celia Siu; Radhouane Aniba; Jazmine Brimhall; Arusha Oloumi; Tomo Osako; Alejandra Bruna; Jose L Sandoval; Teresa Algara; Wendy Greenwood; Kaston Leung; Hongwei Cheng; Hui Xue; Yuzhuo Wang; Dong Lin; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Yongjun Zhao; Julie Lorette; Long Nguyen; David Huntsman; Connie J Eaves; Carl Hansen; Marco A Marra; Carlos Caldas; Sohrab P Shah; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Tumorigenicity of T24 urinary bladder carcinoma cell sublines.

Authors:  U Flatow; A B Rabson; A S Rabson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1987-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  The gene expression signature of genomic instability in breast cancer is an independent predictor of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Jana Doering; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Uwe J Roblick; Nana K Bündgen; Daniel Nicorici; Ulrike Kronenwett; Shruti Rathnagiriswaran; Rama K R Mettu; Yan Ma; Stefan Krüger; Hans-Peter Bruch; Gert Auer; Nancy L Guo; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

Authors:  Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Inferring models of multiscale copy number evolution for single-tumor phylogenetics.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; E Michael Gertz; Darawalee Wangsa; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  7 in total

1.  Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers.

Authors:  Ankit Hirpara; Mathew Bloomfield; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  DNA Replication Vulnerabilities Render Ovarian Cancer Cells Sensitive to Poly(ADP-Ribose) Glycohydrolase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Nisha Pillay; Anthony Tighe; Louisa Nelson; Samantha Littler; Camilla Coulson-Gilmer; Nourdine Bah; Anya Golder; Bjorn Bakker; Diana C J Spierings; Dominic I James; Kate M Smith; Allan M Jordan; Robert D Morgan; Donald J Ogilvie; Floris Foijer; Dean A Jackson; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 38.585

3.  A living biobank of ovarian cancer ex vivo models reveals profound mitotic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Louisa Nelson; Anthony Tighe; Anya Golder; Samantha Littler; Bjorn Bakker; Daniela Moralli; Syed Murtuza Baker; Ian J Donaldson; Diana C J Spierings; René Wardenaar; Bethanie Neale; George J Burghel; Brett Winter-Roach; Richard Edmondson; Andrew R Clamp; Gordon C Jayson; Sudha Desai; Catherine M Green; Andy Hayes; Floris Foijer; Robert D Morgan; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Newly established gastrointestinal cancer cell lines retain the genomic and immunophenotypic landscape of their parental cancers.

Authors:  Daniela Hirsch; Steffen Seyfried; Tobias Staib; David Fiedler; Christian Sauer; Thomas Ried; Stephanie Witt; Felix Rueckert; Timo Gaiser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Intratumor heterogeneity: A new perspective on colorectal cancer research.

Authors:  Zicheng Zheng; Tao Yu; Xinyu Zhao; Xin Gao; Yao Zhao; Gang Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Distinct transcriptional programs stratify ovarian cancer cell lines into the five major histological subtypes.

Authors:  Bethany M Barnes; Louisa Nelson; Anthony Tighe; George J Burghel; I-Hsuan Lin; Sudha Desai; Joanne C McGrail; Robert D Morgan; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 11.117

7.  TP53 loss initiates chromosomal instability in fallopian tube epithelial cells.

Authors:  Daniel Bronder; Anthony Tighe; Darawalee Wangsa; Dali Zong; Thomas J Meyer; René Wardenaar; Paul Minshall; Daniela Hirsch; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Louisa Nelson; Diana Spierings; Joanne C McGrail; Maggie Cam; André Nussenzweig; Floris Foijer; Thomas Ried; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.758

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.