Literature DB >> 15759173

Repositioning accuracy and movement parameters in low back pain subjects and healthy control subjects.

Martin Descarreaux1, Jean-Sébastien Blouin, Normand Teasdale.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A control group study with repeated measures.
OBJECTIVE: To compare trunk repositioning parameters in chronic low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Recent evidence suggests that chronic LBP patients exhibit deficits in trunk proprioception and motor control. Trunk repositioning and the various spatio-temporal parameters related to it can be used to evaluate sensori-motor control and movement strategies.
METHODS: Fifteen control subjects and 16 chronic LBP subjects participated in this study. Subjects were required to reproduce different trunk position in flexion (15 degrees, 30 degrees and 60 degrees) and extension (15 degrees). In the learning phase preceding each condition, visual feedback was provided. Following these learning trials, subjects were asked to perform ten consecutive trials without any feedback. Movement time, movement time variability and peak velocity were obtained and a temporal symmetry ratio was calculated. Peak angular position variability and absolute error in peak angular position were also calculated to evaluate spatial accuracy.
RESULTS: Two subgroups of LBP patients were identified. One subgroup of LBP subjects demonstrated longer movement time and smaller peak velocities and symmetry ratios than normal subjects. No group difference was observed for peak angular position variability and absolute error in peak angular position.
CONCLUSION: Chronic LBP patients, when given a sufficient learning period, were able to reproduce trunk position with a spatial accuracy similar to control subjects. Some LBP subjects, however, showed modifications of movement time, peak velocity and acceleration parameters. We propose that the presence of persistent chronic pain could induce an alteration or an adaptation in the motor responses of chronic LBP subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15759173      PMCID: PMC3476690          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0833-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  Effect of paraspinal muscle vibration on position sense of the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  S Brumagne; R Lysens; S Swinnen; S Verschueren
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The role of anticipation and fear of pain in the persistence of avoidance behavior in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  S M Al-Obaidi; R M Nelson; S Al-Awadhi; N Al-Shuwaie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Repositioning error in low back pain. Comparing trunk repositioning error in subjects with chronic low back pain and control subjects.

Authors:  K Newcomer; E R Laskowski; B Yu; D R Larson; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain.

Authors:  K P Gill; M J Callaghan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Electromyographic response of the porcine multifidus musculature after nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A Indahl; A Kaigle; O Reikerås; S Holm
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Interaction between the porcine lumbar intervertebral disc, zygapophysial joints, and paraspinal muscles.

Authors:  A Indahl; A M Kaigle; O Reikeräs; S H Holm
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; G K Polzhofer; H S Greene
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Differences in repositioning error among patients with low back pain compared with control subjects.

Authors:  K L Newcomer; E R Laskowski; B Yu; J C Johnson; K N An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain.

Authors:  S Brumagne; P Cordo; R Lysens; S Verschueren; S Swinnen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Injury and proprioception in the lower back.

Authors:  T M Parkhurst; C N Burnett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  26 in total

1.  Decreased variability in postural control strategies in young people with non-specific low back pain is associated with altered proprioceptive reweighting.

Authors:  Kurt Claeys; Simon Brumagne; Wim Dankaerts; Henri Kiers; Lotte Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Time course for the development of muscle history in lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles arising from changes in vertebral position.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Diagnostic value of trunk flexion-extension testing in old chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Elisabeth Fehrmann; Richard Habenicht; Christian Oeffel; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effects of lumbosacral orthoses on postural control in individuals with or without non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Jie Mi; Jiling Ye; Xin Zhao; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Individuals with non-specific low back pain use a trunk stiffening strategy to maintain upright posture.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Sharon M Henry; Christine C Raasch; Juvena R Hitt; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Trunk motor control deficits in acute and subacute low back pain are not associated with pain or fear of movement.

Authors:  Won Sung; Mathew Abraham; Christopher Plastaras; Sheri P Silfies
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Effect of Mulligan Concept Lumbar SNAG on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Hisham Mohamed Hussien; Neveen Abdellatif Abdel-Raoof; Omaima Mohamed Kattabei; Hassan Hussien Ahmed
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2017-03-30

8.  Comparison of trunk proprioception between patients with low back pain and healthy controls.

Authors:  Angela S Lee; Jacek Cholewicki; N Peter Reeves; Bohdanna T Zazulak; Lawrence W Mysliwiec
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Attention demands of postural control in non-specific chronic low back pain subjects with low and high pain-related anxiety.

Authors:  Sanaz Shanbehzadeh; Mahyar Salavati; Saeed Talebian; Khosro Khademi-Kalantari; Mahnaz Tavahomi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Modifying patterns of movement in people with low back pain -does it help? A systematic review.

Authors:  Robert A Laird; Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.