Literature DB >> 28060302

A Platform of Anti-biofilm Assays Suited to the Exploration of Natural Compound Libraries.

Malena E Skogman1, Pia M Vuorela1, Adyary Fallarero2.   

Abstract

Biofilms are regarded as one of the most challenging topics of modern biomedicine, and they are potentially responsible for over 80% of antibiotic-tolerant infections. Biofilms have displayed an exceptionally high tolerance for chemotherapy, which is thought to be multifactorial. For instance, the matrix provides a physical barrier that decreases the penetration of antibiotics into the biofilm. Also, cells within the biofilms are phenotypically diverse. Likely, biofilm resilience arises from a combination of these and other, yet unknown, mechanisms. All of the currently existing antibiotics have been developed against single-cells (planktonic) bacteria. Therefore, so far, a very limited repertoire of molecules exists that can selectively act on mature biofilms. This situation has driven a progressive paradigm shift in drug discovery, in which searching for anti-biofilms has been urged to occupy a more prominent place. An additional challenge is that there are a very limited number of standardized methods for biofilm research, especially those that can be used for large-throughput screening of chemical libraries. Here, an experimental anti-biofilm platform for chemical screening is presented. It uses three assays to measure biofilm viability (with resazurin staining), total biomass (with crystal violet staining), and biofilm matrix (using a wheat germ agglutinin, WGA-fluorescence-based staining of the poly-N-acetyl-glucosamine, PNAG, fraction). All the assays were developed using Staphylococcus aureus as the model bacteria. Examples of how the platform can be used for primary screening as well as for functional characterization of identified anti-biofilm hits are presented. This experimental sequence further allows for the classification of the hits based upon the measured end-points. It also provides information on their mode of action, especially on long-term versus short-term chemotherapeutic effects. Thus, it is very advantageous for the quick identification of high-quality hit compounds that can serve as starting points for various biomedical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28060302      PMCID: PMC5226461          DOI: 10.3791/54829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  36 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Biofilms: an extra hurdle for effective antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  P Cos; K Toté; T Horemans; L Maes
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  The Challenging World of Biofilm Physiology.

Authors:  Joke Donné; Sylvia Dewilde
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 4.  The in vivo biofilm.

Authors:  Thomas Bjarnsholt; Maria Alhede; Morten Alhede; Steffen R Eickhardt-Sørensen; Claus Moser; Michael Kühl; Peter Østrup Jensen; Niels Høiby
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 17.079

5.  Combining biofilm matrix measurements with biomass and viability assays in susceptibility assessments of antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Malena Elise Skogman; Pia Maarit Vuorela; Adyary Fallarero
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans.

Authors:  Xiaogang Li; Zhun Yan; Jianping Xu
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms.

Authors:  Darla M Goeres; Linda R Loetterle; Martin A Hamilton; Ricardo Murga; Douglas W Kirby; Rodney M Donlan
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 8.  Staphylococcal infections: mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 9.  Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in biofilm: structural and regulatory aspects.

Authors:  Carla Renata Arciola; Davide Campoccia; Stefano Ravaioli; Lucio Montanaro
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Application of a high throughput Alamar blue biofilm susceptibility assay to Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Robin K Pettit; Christine A Weber; George R Pettit
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.944

View more
  2 in total

1.  Screening serine/threonine and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for histidine kinase inhibition.

Authors:  Kaelyn E Wilke; Conrad A Fihn; Erin E Carlson
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Multisubstituted pyrimidines effectively inhibit bacterial growth and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Riccardo Provenzani; Paola San-Martin-Galindo; Ghada Hassan; Ashenafi Legehar; Aleksi Kallio; Henri Xhaard; Adyary Fallarero; Jari Yli-Kauhaluoma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.