Literature DB >> 30803974

Measuring Antimicrobial Efficacy against Biofilms: a Meta-analysis.

Philip S Stewart1,2, Albert E Parker3,4.   

Abstract

Through a statistical meta-analysis of published data on antimicrobial efficacy against biofilms formed by two common bacterial species, it was concluded that the particular experimental method used is the most important factor determining the outcome of the test. An expected dose-response relationship (greater killing with higher doses or longer treatment times) was observed for data sets derived from a single method but was not observed when data from multiple studies using diverse methods were pooled. Method-specific properties such as the surface area/volume ratio, areal biofilm cell density, and microbial species were shown to influence quantitative measurements of biofilm killing. A better appreciation of the method characteristics that affect antibiofilm efficacy tests could aid decision-making related to investment in research and development and regulatory approvals for biofilm control strategies. The following recommendations are offered to those working in research and development related to biofilm control: (i) report the log reduction, surface area/volume ratio, and biofilm areal cell density; (ii) include data for a benchmark agent, making sure that this agent performs competitively at the dose tested; (iii) measure the dose-response relationship, i.e., make measurements at multiple treatment concentrations or dose durations; and (iv) use a standardized method in addition to research methods.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Keywords:  antimicrobial agents; biofilm; quantitative methods; statistics

Year:  2019        PMID: 30803974      PMCID: PMC6496104          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00020-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  53 in total

1.  In vitro bactericidal activities of beta-lactamases, amikacin, and fluoroquinolones against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm in artificial urine.

Authors:  T Goto; Y Nakame; M Nishida; Y Ohi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Evidence of bacterial adaptation to monochloramine in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and evaluation of biocide action model.

Authors:  S S Sanderson; P S Stewart
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1997-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Insights on antimicrobial resistance, biofilms and the use of phytochemicals as new antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Anabela Borges; Maria J Saavedra; Manuel Simões
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Potency and penetration of telavancin in staphylococcal biofilms.

Authors:  Kelly R Kirker; Steve T Fisher; Garth A James
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  In vitro evaluation of the antibiotic lock technique (ALT) for the treatment of catheter-related infections caused by staphylococci.

Authors:  Ji-Young Lee; Kwan Soo Ko; Kyong Ran Peck; Won Sup Oh; Jae-Hoon Song
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Antimicrobial activity of essential oils against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Daniel Vázquez-Sánchez; Marta L Cabo; Juan J Rodríguez-Herrera
Journal:  Food Sci Technol Int       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.023

7.  Physiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms as revealed by transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  James P Folsom; Lee Richards; Betsey Pitts; Frank Roe; Garth D Ehrlich; Albert Parker; Aurélien Mazurie; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Evaluation of High-Dose Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin Alone or Combined with Clarithromycin or Rifampin Against Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis in a Novel In Vitro PK/PD Model of Bacterial Biofilm.

Authors:  Ashley D Hall Snyder; Celine Vidaillac; Warren Rose; John P McRoberts; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2014-12-18

9.  Reproducibility of antimicrobial test methods.

Authors:  Albert E Parker; Martin A Hamilton; Darla M Goeres
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Activity of disinfectants against foodborne pathogens in suspension and adhered to stainless steel surfaces.

Authors:  Tatiane Karen Cabeça; Antonio Carlos Pizzolitto; Elisabeth Loshchagin Pizzolitto
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

View more
  6 in total

1.  Conceptual Model of Biofilm Antibiotic Tolerance That Integrates Phenomena of Diffusion, Metabolism, Gene Expression, and Physiology.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart; Ben White; Laura Boegli; Timothy Hamerly; Kerry S Williamson; Michael J Franklin; Brian Bothner; Garth A James; Steve Fisher; Francisco G Vital-Lopez; Anders Wallqvist
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Adjunctive Rifampicin Increases Antibiotic Efficacy in Group A Streptococcal Tissue Infection Models.

Authors:  H Bergsten; L M Palma Medina; M Morgan; K Moll; D H Skutlaberg; S Skrede; T Wajima; M Svensson; A Norrby-Teglund
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Nanotargeting of Resistant Infections with a Special Emphasis on the Biofilm Landscape.

Authors:  Amjed Alabresm; Savannah L Chandler; Brian C Benicewicz; Alan W Decho
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.774

4.  Evaluating the Effects of Disinfectants on Bacterial Biofilms Using a Microfluidics Flow Cell and Time-Lapse Fluorescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Milos Legner; James Jonkman; Dean Swift
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-22

5.  Experimental Designs to Study the Aggregation and Colonization of Biofilms by Video Microscopy With Statistical Confidence.

Authors:  Brian A Pettygrove; Heidi J Smith; Kyler B Pallister; Jovanka M Voyich; Philip S Stewart; Albert E Parker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Reducing Biofilm Infections in Burn Patients' Wounds and Biofilms on Surfaces in Hospitals, Medical Facilities and Medical Equipment to Improve Burn Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Bennett Charles Thomas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.