Literature DB >> 15757609

Effect of chronic right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular function.

James H O'Keefe1, Hussam Abuissa, Philip G Jones, Randall C Thompson, Timothy M Bateman, A Iain McGhie, Brian M Ramza, David M Steinhaus.   

Abstract

The determinants of change in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) over time in patients with impaired LV function at baseline have not been clearly established. Using a nuclear database to assess changes in LV function over time, we included patients with a baseline LVEF of 25% to 40% on a gated single-photon emission computed tomographic study at rest and only if second-gated photon emission computed tomography performed approximately 18 months after the initial study showed an improvement in LVEF at rest of > or =10 points or a decrease in LVEF at rest of > or =7 points. In all, 148 patients qualified for the EF increase group and 59 patients for the EF decrease group. LVEF on average increased from 33 +/- 4% to 51 +/- 8% in the EF increase group and decreased from 35 +/- 4% to 25 +/- 5% in the EF decrease group. The strongest multivariable predictor of improvement of LVEF was beta-blocker therapy (odds ratio 3.9, p = 0.002). The strongest independent predictor of LVEF decrease was the presence of a permanent right ventricular apical pacemaker (odds ratio 6.6, p = 0.002). Thus, this study identified beta-blocker therapy as the major independent predictor for improvement in LVEF of > or =10 points, whereas a permanent pacemaker (right ventricular apical pacing) was the strongest predictor of a LVEF decrease of > or =7 points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15757609     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  23 in total

1.  Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  New concepts in physiologic cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Dwight W Reynolds; Christina M Murray
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

Review 4.  Basic Properties And Clinical Applications Of The Intracardiac.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; Lina Marcantoni; Gianni Pastore; Enrico Baracca; Silvio Aggio; Franco Di Gregorio; Alberto Barbetta; Mauro Carraro; Claudio Picariello; Luca Conte; Loris Roncon
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-12-31

Review 5.  Treatment Considerations for a Dual Epidemic of Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure.

Authors:  Parikshit S Sharma; David J Callans
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

6.  Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: Role of catheter ablation therapies.

Authors:  Nasir Shariff; Abdul Aleem; Vadim Levin; Mukesh Singh; Nauman Islam; Ronald Freudenberger
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012

7.  Evaluation of cardiac function by pacing at different right ventricular sites in patients with third-degree atrioventricular block using Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Qing Zhao; Jin-Shan Wo; Jie Guo; Shang-Lang Cai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

8.  The effects of short time right ventricular pacing on left atrial mechanical functions.

Authors:  Oyku Gulmez; Ilyas Atar; Elif Sade; I Asli Atar; Cagatay Ertan; Haldun Muderrisoglu; Bulent Ozin
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2009-05-15

9.  Ventricular pacing: to pace or not to pace.

Authors:  Paul A Levine
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in children.

Authors:  Anjan S Batra; Seshadri Balaji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.