Literature DB >> 15756683

Bystander signaling between glioma cells and fibroblasts targeted with counted particles.

Chunlin Shao1, Melvyn Folkard, Barry D Michael, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

Radiation-induced bystander effects may play an important role in cancer risks associated with environmental, occupational and medical exposures and they may also present a therapeutic opportunity to modulate the efficacy of radiotherapy. However, the mechanisms underpinning these responses between tumor and normal cells are poorly understood. Using a microbeam, we investigated interactions between T98G malignant glioma cells and AG01522 normal fibroblasts by targeting cells through their nuclei in one population, then detecting cellular responses in the other co-cultured non-irradiated population. It was found that when a fraction of cells was individually irradiated with exactly 1 or 5 helium particles ((3)He(2+)), the yield of micronuclei (MN) in the non-irradiated population was significantly increased. This increase was not related to the fraction of cells targeted or the number of particles delivered to those cells. Even when one cell was targeted with a single (3)He(2+), the induction of MN in the bystander non-irradiated population could be increased by 79% for AG01522 and 28% for T98G. Furthermore, studies showed that nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were involved in these bystander responses. Following nuclear irradiation in only 1% of cells, the NO level in the T98G population was increased by 31% and the ROS level in the AG0 population was increased by 18%. Treatment of cultures with 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (c-PTIO), an NO scavenger, abolished the bystander MN induction in non-irradiated AG01522 cells but only partially in non-irradiated T98G cells, and this could be eliminated by treatment with either DMSO or antioxidants. Our findings indicate that differential mechanisms involving NO and ROS signaling factors play a role in bystander responses generated from targeted T98G glioma and AG0 fibroblasts, respectively. These bystander interactions suggest that a mechanistic control of the bystander effect could be of benefit to radiotherapy. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15756683     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  26 in total

1.  Investigations into the role of inflammation in normal tissue response to irradiation.

Authors:  Richard Peter Hill; Asif Zaidi; Javed Mahmood; Salomeh Jelveh
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Whole-genome gene expression profiling reveals the major role of nitric oxide in mediating the cellular transcriptional response to ionizing radiation in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mykyta V Sokolov; Igor G Panyutin; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 3.  NOS Expression and NO Function in Glioma and Implications for Patient Therapies.

Authors:  Anh N Tran; Nathaniel H Boyd; Kiera Walker; Anita B Hjelmeland
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  Radiation-induced intercellular signaling mediated by cytochrome-c via a p53-dependent pathway in hepatoma cells.

Authors:  M He; M Zhao; B Shen; K M Prise; C Shao
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  New molecular targets in radiotherapy: DNA damage signalling and repair in targeted and non-targeted cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 6.  Microbeam studies of the bystander response.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Boris Vojnovic; Oleg Belyakov; Chunlin Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  ATM acts downstream of ATR in the DNA damage response signaling of bystander cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kai Rothkamm; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  LET-dependent bystander effects caused by irradiation of human prostate carcinoma cells with X rays or alpha particles.

Authors:  Vered Anzenberg; Sarika Chandiramani; Jeffrey A Coderre
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Bystander effects induced by direct and scattered radiation generated during penetration of medium inside a water phantom.

Authors:  Maria Konopacka; Jacek Rogoliński; Krzysztof Slosarek
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-10-29

Review 10.  Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles: insights into bystander effects of exosomes after irradiation.

Authors:  Nasrollah Jabbari; Mohammad Karimipour; Majid Khaksar; Elinaz Akbariazar; Morteza Heidarzadeh; Behnam Mojarad; Hossein Aftab; Reza Rahbarghazi; Jafar Rezaie
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.