Literature DB >> 15756565

Bacterial translocation in acute rejection after small bowel transplantation in rats.

Y Zou1, F Hernandez, E Burgos, L Martinez, S Gonzalez-Reyes, V Fernandez-Dumont, G Lopez, M Romero, M Lopez-Santamaria, J A Tovar.   

Abstract

Acute rejection after small bowel transplantation (SBTx) may facilitate bacterial translocation (BT) and subsequent changes in the liver, spleen, and lungs. This study investigated whether BT occurs after acute rejection and whether this is followed by changes in the structure of the intestine and the phagocytic organs interposed between the gut and the general circulation. Orthotopic SBTx was performed in allogeneic (ALLO) rat-strain combinations (BN-Wistar, n=5). For comparison we used syngeneic SBTx (SYN) (BN-BN, n=6) controls. Animals were sacrificed on postoperative day 7. Mesenteric lymph nodes and portal and caval blood were cultured for aerobes and anaerobes. Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase DNA was assessed by polymerase chain reaction in the blood samples. Intestine, liver, spleen, and lung protein and DNA contents were measured. Histologic changes were graded according to standard criteria of acute rejection. For comparisons we used chi(2) and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test with a threshold of significance of p<0.05. ALLO rats lost more weight after SBTx than SYN rats (-13.02+/-4.39% vs. -8.04+/-5.08% of preoperative weight), although the difference was not significant (ns). A variable degree of graft rejection was histologically demonstrated in all ALLO rats, and DNA/protein content in the graft was significantly higher in this group (0.245+/-0.85 vs. 0.134+/-0.21, p<0.05). Gram-negative enteric bacteria were found in 4/5 ALLO and 4/6 SYN rats (ns), and aerobic Gram-positive bacteria in 2/5 and 3/6 (ns), respectively. Anaerobic growth occurred in mesenteric lymph nodes in one ALLO rat and in the bloodstream in another one. E. coli DNA was isolated in none of the ALLO but in two SYN rats (ns). BT was frequent after SBTx in both syngeneic and allogeneic strain combinations. Contrary to our expectations, BT after SBTx was not higher in ALLO group rats. However, anaerobic germs were isolated only in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15756565     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-004-1321-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  26 in total

Review 1.  Influence of the critically ill state on host-pathogen interactions within the intestine: gut-derived sepsis redefined.

Authors:  John C Alverdy; Robert S Laughlin; Licheng Wu
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Bacterial translocation and multiple system organ failure in bowel ischemia and reperfusion.

Authors:  S Zhi-Yong; Y L Dong; X H Wang
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-02

3.  Thermal injury promotes bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract in mice with impaired T-cell-mediated immunity.

Authors:  E A Deitch; J Winterton; R Berg
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-01

4.  Simple intestinal obstruction causes bacterial translocation in man.

Authors:  E A Deitch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-06

5.  Clinical intestinal transplantation: a decade of experience at a single center.

Authors:  K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; G Bond; G Mazariegos; T Wu; N Murase; R Sindhi; D Martin; J Colangelo; M Zak; D Janson; M Ezzelarab; I Dvorchik; M Parizhskaya; M Deutsch; A Demetris; J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Outcome after intestinal transplantation: results from one center's 9-year experience; discussion 1031-2.

Authors:  D G Farmer; S V McDiarmid; H Yersiz; G Cortina; F Amersi; J Vargas; G Gershman; M Ament; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-09

7.  Ninety-five cases of intestinal transplantation at the University of Miami.

Authors:  Seigo Nishida; David Levi; Tomoaki Kato; Jose R Nery; Naveen Mittal; Nicholas Hadjis; Juan Madariaga; Andreas G Tzakis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Intestinal transplantation before and after the introduction of sirolimus.

Authors:  Thomas M Fishbein; Sander Florman; Gabriel Gondolesi; Thomas Schiano; Neal LeLeiko; Allan Tschernia; Stuart Kaufman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Gut barrier dysfunction in experimental acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  R Andersson; X D Wang
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Critical assessment of the methods used for detection of bacterial translocation.

Authors:  F Hernandez Oliveros; Y Zou; G Lopez; M Romero; L Martínez; S González-Reyes; A García; P Peña; J A Tovar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 1.827

View more
  4 in total

1.  Structural shifts of fecal microbial communities in rats with acute rejection after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yirui Xie; Zhuanbo Luo; Zhengfeng Li; Min Deng; Hao Liu; Biao Zhu; Bing Ruan; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Experimental small bowel preservation using Polysol: a new alternative to University of Wisconsin solution, Celsior and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution?

Authors:  Lai Wei; Koichiro Hata; Benedict-Marie Doorschodt; Reinhard Büttner; Thomas Minor; René H Tolba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to small intestine allograft rejection.

Authors:  Sheri M Krams; Mouer Wang; Ricardo O Castillo; Takashi Ito; Lori Phillips; John Higgins; Neeraja Kambham; Carlos O Esquivel; Olivia M Martinez
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Kampo medicine "Dai-kenchu-to" prevents bacterial translocation in rats.

Authors:  Kozo Yoshikawa; Nobuhiro Kurita; Jun Higashijima; Tomohiko Miyatani; Hidenori Miyamoto; Masanori Nishioka; Mitsuo Shimada
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.