Literature DB >> 12042637

Intestinal transplantation before and after the introduction of sirolimus.

Thomas M Fishbein1, Sander Florman, Gabriel Gondolesi, Thomas Schiano, Neal LeLeiko, Allan Tschernia, Stuart Kaufman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Small bowel transplantation has been limited by high rates of rejection and graft loss. In June 2000, we began using sirolimus, an immunosuppression agent with proven efficacy in kidney transplantation. We reviewed results among intestinal transplant recipients before and after the introduction of sirolimus.
METHODS: Thirty-one intestinal transplants were performed in 29 patients at our center between July 1998 and April 2001. All patients were followed for at least 30 days posttransplant. In the first 19 transplants (group 1), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, and antibody induction therapy (either daclizumab or OKT3). In the next 12 consecutive transplants (group 2), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, basiliximab, and sirolimus.
RESULTS: Eighteen children (7 males and 11 females, mean age 2.1+/-2.2 years) and 11 adults (9 males and 2 females, mean age 38.1+/-12.4 years) underwent transplantation. All patients survived transplantation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.7 procedures per patient in group 1 and 1.1 procedures per patient in group 2. The most common indications were abscess (n=7), planned second look (n=7), leaks/fistulas (n=6), dehiscence (n=6), obstruction (n=4), ischemic bowel (n=3), perforations (n=3), stomal complications (n=3), and graft removal (n=3). The incidence of biopsy-proven rejection in the first 30 days was 73.7% in group 1 and 16.7% in group 2 (P<0.002). Sirolimus was temporarily held or discontinued in 66.7% of patients. Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 57.9% without sirolimus (P<0.04). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 79% without sirolimus (P=0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: An immunosuppressive regimen that includes sirolimus has improved graft survival. Furthermore, this regimen has significantly decreased the incidence of early rejection and has eliminated early graft loss caused by fulminant rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12042637     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200205270-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current status of intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  Takehisa Ueno; Masahiro Fukuzawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  The current status of small bowel transplantation in the UK and internationally.

Authors:  S J Middleton; N V Jamieson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Gut microbiota and its implications in small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  Chenyang Wang; Qiurong Li; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Chronic Rejection After Intestinal Transplant: Where Are We in Order to Avert It?

Authors:  Augusto Lauro; Mihai Oltean; Ignazio R Marino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Intestinal transplantation: a review.

Authors:  Chirag Sureshchandra Desai; Khalid Mahmood Khan; Raffaele Girlanda; Thomas M Fishbein
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-31

Review 6.  The role of mTOR signaling pathway in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Haruo Kanno; Hiroshi Ozawa; Akira Sekiguchi; Seiji Yamaya; Satoshi Tateda; Kenichiro Yahata; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  Advances in the management of short bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Jackson; Alan L Buchman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-10

Review 8.  Short bowel syndrome: parenteral nutrition versus intestinal transplantation. Where are we today?

Authors:  Mark DeLegge; Mohammad M Alsolaiman; English Barbour; Samah Bassas; M Faisal Siddiqi; Nicole M Moore
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Bacterial translocation in acute rejection after small bowel transplantation in rats.

Authors:  Y Zou; F Hernandez; E Burgos; L Martinez; S Gonzalez-Reyes; V Fernandez-Dumont; G Lopez; M Romero; M Lopez-Santamaria; J A Tovar
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum.

Authors:  J Michael Tredger; Nigel W Brown; Anil Dhawan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.