Literature DB >> 15753331

Estimates of genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behavior, and daily gain in composite ram lambs.

K M Cammack1, K A Leymaster, T G Jenkins, M K Nielsen.   

Abstract

Our objective was to estimate genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behavior, and ADG in composite ram lambs ((1/2) Columbia, (1/4) Hampshire, (1/4) Suffolk). Data were collected from 1986 to 1997 on 1,239 ram lambs from approximately 11 to 17 wk of age at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center near Clay Center, NE. Feeding equipment consisted of an elevated pen with an entrance chute that permitted access to the feeder by only one ram lamb at a time, with disappearance of feed measured by an electronic weighing system. Ram lambs were grouped 11 per pen from 1986 to 1989, and nine per pen from 1990 to 1997. Data were edited to exclude invalid feeding events, and approximately 80% of the data remained after edits were applied. Traits analyzed were daily feed intake (DFI), event feed intake (EFI), residual feed intake (RFI), daily feeding time (DFT), event feeding time (EFT), number of daily feeding events (DFE), and ADG. Feed intake traits of DFI and EFI had estimated heritabilities of 0.25 and 0.33, respectively, whereas estimated heritability of RFI was 0.11. Heritability estimates for feeding behavior traits, including DFT, EFT, and DFE, ranged from 0.29 to 0.36. Average daily gain had an estimated heritability of 0.26. Genetic correlations were positive between all pairs of traits, except for RFI and ADG, and that estimate was essentially zero. Phenotypic correlations were generally similar to genetic correlations. Genetic correlations were large (0.80) between DFI and ADG, intermediate between DFI and RFI (0.61) and between DFT and DFE (0.55), and low (0.17 to 0.31) for the other pairs of traits, with the exception of RFI and ADG (-0.03). Genetic correlations between behavioral traits were greater than correlations between behavioral traits and measures of feed intake or ADG; however, selection for ADG and/or feed intake would be expected to cause some changes in feeding behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15753331     DOI: 10.2527/2005.834777x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Diet alters both the structure and taxonomy of the ovine gut microbial ecosystem.

Authors:  Melinda J Ellison; Gavin C Conant; Rebecca R Cockrum; Kathy J Austin; Huan Truong; Michela Becchi; William R Lamberson; Kristi M Cammack
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.

Authors:  Ira L Parsons; Jocelyn R Johnson; William C Kayser; Luis O Tedeschi; Gordon E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Poor feed efficiency in sheep is associated with several structural abnormalities in the community metabolic network of their ruminal microbes.

Authors:  Rocky D Patil; Melinda J Ellison; Sara M Wolff; Courtney Shearer; Anna M Wright; Rebecca R Cockrum; Kathy J Austin; William R Lamberson; Kristi M Cammack; Gavin C Conant
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Predicting residual feed intake status using rumen microbial profiles in ewe lambs1.

Authors:  Melinda J Ellison; Gavin C Conant; William R Lamberson; Kathleen J Austin; Edward van Kirk; Hannah C Cunningham; Daniel C Rule; Kristi M Cammack
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Genetic and phenotypic parameters for feed efficiency and component traits in American mink.

Authors:  Pourya Davoudi; Duy Do; Stefanie M Colombo; Bruce Rathgeber; Guoyu Hu; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Zhiquan Wang; Graham Plastow; Younes Miar
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.338

6.  Eating Time as a Genetic Indicator of Methane Emissions and Feed Efficiency in Australian Maternal Composite Sheep.

Authors:  Boris J Sepulveda; Stephanie K Muir; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Matthew I Knight; Ralph Behrendt; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Genome-Wide Association Study of Feed Efficiency Related Traits in Ducks.

Authors:  Qixin Guo; Lan Huang; Yong Jiang; Zhixiu Wang; Yulin Bi; Guohong Chen; Hao Bai; Guobin Chang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.231

8.  Evaluation of the Links between Lamb Feed Efficiency and Rumen and Plasma Metabolomic Data.

Authors:  Florian Touitou; Flavie Tortereau; Lydie Bret; Nathalie Marty-Gasset; Didier Marcon; Annabelle Meynadier
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-03-29

9.  Modelling the consequences of targeted selective treatment strategies on performance and emergence of anthelmintic resistance amongst grazing calves.

Authors:  Zoe Berk; Yan C S M Laurenson; Andrew B Forbes; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  A stochastic model to investigate the effects of control strategies on calves exposed to Ostertagia ostertagi.

Authors:  Zoe Berk; Yan C S M Laurenson; Andrew B Forbes; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.