Literature DB >> 15746053

Phase I pharmacokinetic, food effect, and pharmacogenetic study of oral irinotecan given as semisolid matrix capsules in patients with solid tumors.

Otto Soepenberg1, Herlinde Dumez, Jaap Verweij, Floris A de Jong, Maja J A de Jonge, José Thomas, Ferry A L M Eskens, Ron H N van Schaik, Johan Selleslach, Judith Ter Steeg, Patricia Lefebvre, Sylvie Assadourian, Ger-Jan Sanderink, Alex Sparreboom, Allan T van Oosterom.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetic profile, and food effect of orally administered irinotecan formulated as new semisolid matrix capsules. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Irinotecan was given orally in fasted patients once daily for 5 consecutive days and repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to take the drug along with a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast for the administration at day 1 of the first or second cycle. Dosages tested were 70 and 80 mg/m(2)/day.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received 101 cycles of therapy (median two cycles, range 1-15). During the first cycle, grade 3 delayed diarrhea and grade 3 fever were the DLTs at the dosage of 80 mg/m(2)/day in three out of five patients. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate. Exposure to the active metabolite SN-38 was relatively high compared with i.v. infusion, but no relevant accumulation was observed. Food had no significant effect on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. One confirmed partial remission and 10 disease stabilizations were observed in previously treated patients. No association was found between the UGT1A1*28 genotype and the risk of severe irinotecan-induced toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: For oral irinotecan, a dose of 70 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks is recommended for further studies. Delayed diarrhea was the main DLT, similar to that observed with intravenously administered irinotecan. This study confirms that oral administration of irinotecan is feasible and may have favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15746053     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

Review 1.  Uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase genetic polymorphisms and response to cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jacqueline Ramírez; Mark J Ratain; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Pharmacokinetic modeling to assess factors affecting the oral bioavailability of the lactone and carboxylate forms of the lipophilic camptothecin analogue AR-67 in rats.

Authors:  Eyob D Adane; Zhiwei Liu; Tian-Xiang Xiang; Bradley D Anderson; Markos Leggas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  A single-arm pilot phase II study of gefitinib and irinotecan in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Wayne L Furman; Lisa M McGregor; M Beth McCarville; Mihaela Onciu; Andrew M Davidoff; Sandy Kovach; Dana Hawkins; Valerie McPherson; Peter J Houghton; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Clinton F Stewart; Victor M Santana
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Phase I study of oral irinotecan as a single-agent and given sequentially with capecitabine.

Authors:  Laura W Goff; Al B Benson; Patricia M LoRusso; Antoinette R Tan; Jordan D Berlin; Louis J Denis; Rebecca J Benner; Donghua Yin; Mace L Rothenberg
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Phase I trial of oral irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: a new approach to neuroblastoma therapy consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Refining the UGT1A haplotype associated with irinotecan-induced hematological toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil/irinotecan-based regimens.

Authors:  Eric Lévesque; Anne-Sophie Bélanger; Mario Harvey; Félix Couture; Derek Jonker; Federico Innocenti; Erica Cecchin; Giuseppe Toffoli; Chantal Guillemette
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitor enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  Wayne L Furman; Fariba Navid; Najat C Daw; M Beth McCarville; Lisa M McGregor; Sheri L Spunt; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; John C Panetta; Kristine R Crews; Jianrong Wu; Amar J Gajjar; Peter J Houghton; Victor M Santana; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase I trial of two schedules of vincristine, oral irinotecan, and temozolomide (VOIT) for children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; John P Perentesis; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; Stephanie L Safgren; Marvin D Nelson; Ashish M Ingle; Susan M Blaney; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 9.  Do pharmacokinetic polymorphisms explain treatment failure in high-risk patients with neuroblastoma?

Authors:  Francesco Bellanti; Bertil Kågedal; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Can UGT1A1 genotyping reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Linda A Bradley; Michael P Douglas; Katherine Kolor; W David Dotson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.